Estimation of ductility of Fe–Al alloys by means of small punch test

Dobeš, F.; Milička, K.

doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2009.11.002

Cited by 22 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A number of laboratories, not just within Europe, and including those of the authors have continued with SP creep and high temperature tensile testing since the original launch of the Code of Practice in 2006. A wide range of materials have been tested including P91/92 weldments by Blagoeva and Hurst (2009), Gulcimen et al (20013), Ma et al (2009), Zhao et al (2013), Milicka and Dobes (2006)); P24 weld metal by Sturm and Grum (2012); a welded P22 header steel by Tonti et al (2012); ODS steels by and Bruchhausen et al (2014); MCrAlY coatings by Chen et al (2013); chromium and low alloy steels by Singh et al (2014) and Nishioka et al (2010); Al-Al 4 C 3 by Dobes et al (2012); Fe-Al alloys by Dobes and Milicka (2010); Ti-Al alloys by Norton et al (2012) and ; repair welded IN718 alloys by Hurst et al (2013) and and finally nickel base turbine alloys by Cammi et al (2009). All tests have been carried out in the range 200 o C to 900 o C and in nearly all cases the testing procedures outlined in the CoP have been accurately followed.…”

Section: Figure1 Geometry Of the Sp Test Installation According To Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Renaissance in the Use of the Small Punch Testing Technique

Hurst

Matocha

2015

Volume 1B: Codes and Standards

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The underlying purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether the CEN CWA 15627 “Small Punch Test Method for Metallic Materials” first published in 2006 has indeed succeeded in providing a stimulus for a wider implementation of the small punch test technique in industrial applications throughout Europe and indeed worldwide. A wealth of research progress has been apparent, as strongly evidenced in three dedicated SSTT (Small Specimen Testing Techniques) conferences held in Europe over the last five years, but also in the wider literature. In particular it is important to mention the recent publication of a Japanese standard and the announcement of parallel progress in China. The present paper concentrates on progress within Europe from the launch of the Code to the present day. In particular attention is focused on the need for industrial acceptance of the test methodology and methods for evaluating the results. Some scepticism still seems to prevail within sectors of the conventional power generation industry, an industry which can potentially benefit most from successful remanent lifetime extension tools of which small punch testing can be considered as a prime candidate. In spite of this, it is demonstrated that a major proportion of the Small Punch testing research of the last decade has been carried out on power plant steels. Meanwhile it is shown that there is evidence that the original remit of the methodology in assessing the integrity of irradiated nuclear plant remains active, new interest is developing for aerospace and next generation nuclear applications enhancing further the credibility of the Code.

show abstract

Section: Figure1 Geometry Of the Sp Test Installation According To Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Renaissance in the Use of the Small Punch Testing Technique

Hurst

Matocha

2015

Volume 1B: Codes and Standards

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Over the years, this application hardly took hold and it is only in recent years that increased attention has been directed at the test methodology for high temperature applications particularly in the fossil fuel power generation industry [4][5][6]. Two factors have mainly led to this resurrection in interest, firstly the need for accurate remaining life prediction both in connection with safety but also with lifetime extension of plant components and secondly the recent attempt to standardize the test methodology through a Code of Practice (CoP) for Small Punch testing [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualification of P91 welds through Small Punch creep testing

Blagoeva¹,

Li²,

Hurst³

2011

Journal of Nuclear Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Observing this gap in the literature and the important technical features of materials that contain aluminides [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], the purpose of this work is to further our understanding of the micro-abrasive wear behavior of an iron aluminide alloy under ambient and high-temperature conditions.…”

Section: Rolling Abrasionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Beyond the advantage of this layer of alumina in protecting the material against corrosion and high temperatures of oxidation [2][3][4], the aluminide alloys have smaller densities (due to greater thermodynamic stability) than the chromium oxide (Cr 2 O 3 ) scale characteristic of stainless steels [2], high fusion points, and show considerable mechanical and metallurgical properties [3,[5][6][7] because of their crystalline structure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%