2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Decay Coefficients for Unsteady Friction for Instantaneous, Acceleration-Based Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also demonstrate that the first-order FVM is as good as the MOC, which was also demonstrated by Pal et al [53]. In addition, the FVM method [53] was also validated with experimental data, as demonstrated by USC-2 in the work of Reddy et al [88] In a further study, a validation exercise was undertaken for first-order and secondorder FVMs as per the methodology presented in Pal et al [53]. A frictionless pipe system with a large reservoir at the upstream and a valve at the downstream was considered.…”
Section: Figure 13supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results also demonstrate that the first-order FVM is as good as the MOC, which was also demonstrated by Pal et al [53]. In addition, the FVM method [53] was also validated with experimental data, as demonstrated by USC-2 in the work of Reddy et al [88] In a further study, a validation exercise was undertaken for first-order and secondorder FVMs as per the methodology presented in Pal et al [53]. A frictionless pipe system with a large reservoir at the upstream and a valve at the downstream was considered.…”
Section: Figure 13supporting
confidence: 77%
“…These results also demonstrate that the first-order FVM is as good as the MOC, which was also demonstrated by Pal et al [53]. In addition, the FVM method [53] was also validated with experimental data, as demonstrated by USC-2 in the work of Reddy et al [88]. The pipe system consisted of 156-m-long copper pipe of 0.025 m diameter.…”
Section: Figure 13supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The friction factor was considered to be steady with a value of 0.02, since this study was numerical verification-oriented. Readers can refer to related studies regarding unsteady friction [51,52]. Equations (8) and (9) are respectively the momentum and continuity equations.…”
Section: Hydraulic Transient Model and Faults In The Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the IAB model can be more suitable for practical applications for large-scale and complex pipe systems compared to the WFB model due to its high computational efficiency without the convolutional computation. It was found that the implementation of the IAB unsteady friction model in the 1D water-hammer model does not significantly increase computation time compared to those cases using only the steady friction term (Vitkovsky et al 2000;Reddy et al 2012). However, the IAB model-for which a thermodynamics framework is given in Axworthy et al (2000)-was developed empirically based on various experimental tests and applications (Brunone et al 1995;Brunone and Golia 2008;Bergant et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main disadvantage of applying this IAB model is the need for precalibration for the empirical coefficient, k d , based on the available data in a specific system, which potentially increases the work load and uncertainties in practical applications. Although many researchers have investigated the determination and improvement of the k d coefficient (Bergant and Simpson 1994;Bughazen and Anderson 1996;Pezzinga 2000;Vardy and Brown 1996;Reddy et al 2012), so far there is not yet a general coefficient expression for the IAB model that is valid and applicable for all practical cases. Moreover, many studies have implied that this k coefficient in the IAB model would be time and space dependent in transient pipe flow simulations (Vitkovsky et al 2000;Brunone et al 2004;Storli and Nielsen 2011a, b), which makes the calibration and application of this IAB model case sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%