2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) using artificial intelligence methods: Offering a new approach for lagged ETo data-based modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Tabari et al (2015) reported better performance of an AI-based model including the MLP using the antecedent ST data for modelling the ST at deeper layers than the surface layers. Furthermore, the results of the current study verify the outcomes of previous studies such as Mehdizadeh (2018b), Mehdizadeh and Kozekalani Sales (2018), Mehdizadeh et al (2017cMehdizadeh et al ( , 2018bMehdizadeh et al ( , 2019, and Fathian et al (2019). The authors developed different types of the hybrid models through hybridization of the different time-series-and AI-based models for improving the modelling efficiency of classical models in modelling hydrological variables.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Classical And Hybrid Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Likewise, Tabari et al (2015) reported better performance of an AI-based model including the MLP using the antecedent ST data for modelling the ST at deeper layers than the surface layers. Furthermore, the results of the current study verify the outcomes of previous studies such as Mehdizadeh (2018b), Mehdizadeh and Kozekalani Sales (2018), Mehdizadeh et al (2017cMehdizadeh et al ( , 2018bMehdizadeh et al ( , 2019, and Fathian et al (2019). The authors developed different types of the hybrid models through hybridization of the different time-series-and AI-based models for improving the modelling efficiency of classical models in modelling hydrological variables.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Classical And Hybrid Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In order to integrate flux observations to the longer time intervals needed for evaluating water and carbon budgets, gaps introduced by instrument downtime and invalid measurements must be filled in. Machine learning has been well developed for predicting ET since the early-2000s (Whitley et al, 2009;Mehdizadeh, 2018). In this study, we adopted RandomForest for the gap-filling (Breiman, 2001).…”
Section: Machine Learning Prediction Of Water Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trained by a set of fundamental micrometeorological variables, the RandomForest algorithm yields overall accurate predictions of ET in boreal larch forest. However, we emphasize that its application to other ecosystems still needs to be further verified and spatial and temporal scales of input data are an important factor limiting the performance of machine learning algorithms (Whitley et al, 2009;Mehdizadeh, 2018).…”
Section: Flux Gap Filling and Nighttime Transpiration In Boreal Larchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They resulted RMSE between 0.222 to 0.555 mm day −1 . In addition, Mehdizadeh [55] reported RMSE for GEP models from 0.46 to 2.08 mm day −1 .…”
Section: Performance Of Gene Expression Programming (Gep) For Mean Tementioning
confidence: 99%