2019
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201925203004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of critical force of the buckling composite structures using modelling methods

Abstract: The study reported in this paper employed Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to predict the critical force of the buckling composite structures. The critical force depends upon various factors such as thickness, stacking sequence, etc. These factors have been identified in earlier studies by means of the Finite Elements Method (FEM). The critical force is affected by the above-mentioned factors. Various approaches have been applied in the course of the presented study. Apart from our FEM simulation, the ANN appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The captured failure mode ranged from buckling bulge for a ratio of 1 to local buckling for a ratio of 5. Moreover, the linear perturbation procedure in Abaqus was used to simulate the local buckling of hollow box and channel-section Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) short columns and beams through an eigenvalue buckling problem [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, in all these studies, the full load-displacement path and progressive failure were not simulated due to limitations in the analysis method utilised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The captured failure mode ranged from buckling bulge for a ratio of 1 to local buckling for a ratio of 5. Moreover, the linear perturbation procedure in Abaqus was used to simulate the local buckling of hollow box and channel-section Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) short columns and beams through an eigenvalue buckling problem [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, in all these studies, the full load-displacement path and progressive failure were not simulated due to limitations in the analysis method utilised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%