2013
DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0344.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of bubble time period for air-gun clusters using potential isosurfaces

Abstract: We evaluated a method of estimating the relative bubble time period of air-gun clusters with an arbitrary number of guns. This was done by assuming incompressible flow and representing the bubbles as isosurfaces of the potential field to account for coalescence. The kinetic energy at the equilibrium radius was then compared to the equivalent energy of the single gun to estimate the relative change. The results agreed well with two-gun cluster measurements, but the lack of data does not allow us to compare with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, low frequency acoustic waves usually are less harmful to marine mammals 59 . One possible method to reduce the acoustic frequency is to use airgun clusters to cause synchronized individual bubbles to coalesce into a bigger bubble 60,61 , which has a longer period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, low frequency acoustic waves usually are less harmful to marine mammals 59 . One possible method to reduce the acoustic frequency is to use airgun clusters to cause synchronized individual bubbles to coalesce into a bigger bubble 60,61 , which has a longer period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger bubble will, all other things equal, oscillate slower. In conjunction with studies of the time interval between underwater explosion bubble oscillations (Willis, 1941;Cole, 1948), this early work formed the basis for the well-known Rayleigh-Willis equation, which is commonly used in the marine seismic exploration community (Hegna and Parkes, 2011;Barker and Landrø, 2013;Watson et al, 2016):…”
Section: Bubble Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%