2018
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2018.2818142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Broadband Multiuser Millimeter Wave Massive MIMO-OFDM Channels by Exploiting Their Sparse Structure

Abstract: In millimeter wave (mmWave) massive multipleinput multiple-output (MIMO) systems, acquiring accurate channel state information is essential for efficient beamforming (BF) and multiuser interference cancellation, which is a challenging task since a low signal-to-noise ratio is encountered before BF in large antenna arrays. The mmWave channel exhibits a 3-D clustered structure in the virtual angle of arrival (AOA), angle of departure (AOD) and delay domain that is imposed by the effect of power leakage, angular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, we show that the per-2 Note that [25] uses the NNSPL algorithm to exploit the angle domain sparsity of the channel, while [26] uses the NNSPL algorithm to exploit the delay domain sparsity. [23] presents a comprehensive version of the NNSPL algorithm to jointly handle the angle-delay domain sparsity. iteration complexity of STCS is lower than that of NNSPL; we further show that STCS converges much faster than NNSPL.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this regard, we show that the per-2 Note that [25] uses the NNSPL algorithm to exploit the angle domain sparsity of the channel, while [26] uses the NNSPL algorithm to exploit the delay domain sparsity. [23] presents a comprehensive version of the NNSPL algorithm to jointly handle the angle-delay domain sparsity. iteration complexity of STCS is lower than that of NNSPL; we further show that STCS converges much faster than NNSPL.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 7, we compare the average NMSE performance of OMP [9], DSAMP [14], L1 LASSO [9], EM-BG-AMP [16], Turbo-CS [17], AMP-NNSPL-FD [23], The performance is averaged by 100 independent trials at each grid point. The sensing matrix is always chosen as partial DFT-RP matrix for a fair comparison.…”
Section: State Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, mmWave communication usually suffers from the severe path loss. Traditional fully-digital precoding with massive antennas can be used to mitigate the severe path loss, but at the cost of high power consumption and hardware cost [5]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%