2018
DOI: 10.2478/congeo-2018-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Bouguer correction density based on underground and surface gravity measurements and precise modelling of topographic effects – two case studies from Slovakia

Abstract: We present a simple and straightforward method for estimating the mean density of topographic masses based on underground gravity measurements along with topography modelling. Two examples under different conditions are given, the first coming from a railway tunnel passing through a Mesozoic karst area and the second from an active coal mine situated in a Neogene sedimentary basin. Relative gravity measurements were processed and corrected by topographic effect modelling based on high-precision airborne LiDAR-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the complete Bouguer anomalies (CBA) data, the Bouguer and terrain corrections have been applied to the gravity disturbance data. The Bouguer correction was used to eliminate the mass effect located between the measurement points on the topographic surface to the datum, which was not taken into account even though this mass greatly affected the gravity anomaly data [32]. Meanwhile, the purpose of terrain correction was to eliminate the mass influence around the measurement point.…”
Section: Results Of Processing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the complete Bouguer anomalies (CBA) data, the Bouguer and terrain corrections have been applied to the gravity disturbance data. The Bouguer correction was used to eliminate the mass effect located between the measurement points on the topographic surface to the datum, which was not taken into account even though this mass greatly affected the gravity anomaly data [32]. Meanwhile, the purpose of terrain correction was to eliminate the mass influence around the measurement point.…”
Section: Results Of Processing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This central part of the profiles is respective to geological structure composed of light-grey limestones (Wetterstein limestones) with a lot of karst phenomena. Based on the difference between the surface gravity and that at vertically projected points inside the railway tunnel we are able to estimate the mean density of the rock massif inbetween the tunnel level and the surface, upon applying respective corrections to the measured gravity due to the gravitational effects of topography, to the tunnel tube void, as well as to the effect of the normal gradient of gravity (Zahorec and Papčo, 2018). As a result we obtained the value of 2.66 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Underground Gravity Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammer, 1950). To precise the estimate of the mean density of rocks of the given region we performed a detailed density analysis based on the approach of Mikuška et al (2017), as well as we also performed methodological measurements of gravity acceleration in the existing nearby parallel railway tunnel (at the depth of about 200 m below the surface), at spots where the surface gravimetric profiles cross the railway tunnel (Zahorec and Papčo, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unpublished report of Hayford, which is at the moment inaccessible to us, was dated 1904. Since then, a lot of measurements of this type have been carried out and reported about, including the one of Hammer (1950) which we just mentioned, and, later on, e.g., Pick and Pícha (1971), Madej (2017), and finally Zahorec and Papčo (2018) to which we refer to here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%