1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00366845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of body weight in Indian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus)

Abstract: Thirty-nine adult Indian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus) of both sexes and various ages and weights, belonging to the Forest Department of the Government of Kerala (India), Temple Devaswoms, Gemini Circus and other private agencies, were used to derive formulae to predict body weight and height from body measurements. Several models were fitted separately for males and females and also for adults irrespective of sex. The best prediction of body weight (W) in kg was obtained for adults irrespective of sex b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is, however, more difficult to directly measure weight than other body parameters, so prediction equations are frequently used, though often without validation using known values of weight. We found chest girth, sometimes referred to as heart girth or thorax circumference in the literature, to be the best predictor of weight in Asian elephants, in line with previous studies on large mammals [ 14 , 17 , 28 , 59 61 ], and some of the other weight prediction equations for Asian elephants [ 36 , 37 , 39 ]. Whether the relationship between chest girth and body weight, and thus the equation used for predicting weight from chest girth, differs between distinct populations of a species is not known outside a few species, and there is no consensus: white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus populations differ in this relationship [ 59 ], though populations of the grizzly bear Ursus arctos may not [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is, however, more difficult to directly measure weight than other body parameters, so prediction equations are frequently used, though often without validation using known values of weight. We found chest girth, sometimes referred to as heart girth or thorax circumference in the literature, to be the best predictor of weight in Asian elephants, in line with previous studies on large mammals [ 14 , 17 , 28 , 59 61 ], and some of the other weight prediction equations for Asian elephants [ 36 , 37 , 39 ]. Whether the relationship between chest girth and body weight, and thus the equation used for predicting weight from chest girth, differs between distinct populations of a species is not known outside a few species, and there is no consensus: white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus populations differ in this relationship [ 59 ], though populations of the grizzly bear Ursus arctos may not [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We applied twenty-one prediction equations from five previous studies in the literature to data on the timber elephants in order to test whether they are applicable in the field for a different population than the one from which they were created. R 2 from these models ranged from 0.080 to 0.956 for these prediction equations, highest from Kurt and Garai’s [ 36 ] male equation ( R 2 = 0.956), which uses chest girth and height, and lowest from Sreekumar and Nirmalan’s [ 39 ] length-based equation ( R 2 = 0.080). The Kurt and Garai [ 36 ] equation for infants provides the most accurate fit ( R 2 = 0.814, mean±SD (%) = 99.3±7.7), though this only applies for elephants under the age of 6 ( Fig 2 , Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relationship between height and weight has been studied by many groups without considering BCS [Kurt and Nettasinghe, ; Sreekumar and Nirmalan, ; Sukumar et al, ]. Hile et al [] reported heart girth (chest girth) is the single best parameter to predict body weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%