2012
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2011.2159691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Battery State of Charge With $H_{\infty}$ Observer: Applied to a Robot for Inspecting Power Transmission Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, for the existing H ∞ observer-based SOC estimation methods, the observer's gain in the work [21] is constant and difficult to calculate to adapt the nonlinear battery model. The H ∞ observer in [22] is also constant and used to deal with the linear battery model. On the contrary, the H ∞ method in this paper is employed to design the observer with dynamic gain for the nonlinear battery model, which is not a trivial work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the existing H ∞ observer-based SOC estimation methods, the observer's gain in the work [21] is constant and difficult to calculate to adapt the nonlinear battery model. The H ∞ observer in [22] is also constant and used to deal with the linear battery model. On the contrary, the H ∞ method in this paper is employed to design the observer with dynamic gain for the nonlinear battery model, which is not a trivial work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of the four methods are much different due to their own particular characteristics, which have been verified by simulations and experiments. The differences in the time consumptions were obvious: the feedback coefficient of the Luenberger observer SOC estimation method is the Luenberger gain which is constant, while the Kalman filter SOC estimation method has to calculate the Kalman gain through Equations (9) to (13), where complex covariances have to be calculated, leading to a longer calculation time. The PIO SOC estimation method takes advantage of the integral of the voltage errors and thus the estimation errors could be smaller and the rise time could be shorter, while the time consumption would be longer than Luenberger SOC estimation method for the added integral part, but shorter than the covariance computation of the Kalman filter SOC estimation method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Luenberger Observer [13] has been widely used in different applications for its simple properties. It was recently introduced to estimate the SOC of batteries [14][15][16].…”
Section: The Luenberger Observer Soc Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, many scholars have proposed substantial methods to improve the accuracy of SOC estimation, such as Ampere hour counting [6], Kalman Filter (KF) [7], H∞ observer [8], sliding model observer [9], etc. Ampere hour counting is an extensively utilized method, which applies integrals with respect to the battery current, but it heavily depends on the accuracy of the current measurement and the initial SOC value [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%