1989
DOI: 10.1121/1.398569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of average under-ice reflection amplitudes and phases using matched-field processing

Abstract: Average low-frequency under-ice reflection amplitudes and phases in the central Arctic were estimated from long-range (260-km) signals from fixed continuous wave (cw) sources detected on a long (1-km) vertical array (the FRAM IV experiment), using conventional and minimum variance estimators in conjunction with matched-field processing. Theoretical computation of the trial source fields for all assumed ranges and depths was based on a normal-mode code into which were incorporated the under-ice reflection ampli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Livingston and Diachok [64] applied MFT for the purpose of investigating under-ice reflectivity to the same data set from FRAl\1 IV that Yang [105] used for the early MFP demonstrations. Recently, Miller and Schmidt [68] applied full wave solutions to the elastic wave equation [83] as replicas to perform MFT to determine the bulk properties of Arctic ice.…”
Section: Matched Field Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livingston and Diachok [64] applied MFT for the purpose of investigating under-ice reflectivity to the same data set from FRAl\1 IV that Yang [105] used for the early MFP demonstrations. Recently, Miller and Schmidt [68] applied full wave solutions to the elastic wave equation [83] as replicas to perform MFT to determine the bulk properties of Arctic ice.…”
Section: Matched Field Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MFP was originally used for source localization, it was subsequently applied to estimation of environmental parameters as well. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] MFP, when applied for the estimation of environmental parameters, is often referred to as matched-field inversion (MFI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion is performed by identifying those values of the model parameters that maximize or minimize a measure (depending on its nature) between replica and true acoustic fields: A misfit function is often minimized between acoustic field and replicas. MFP was originally used for source localization and was later adapted and applied to estimation of environmental parameters [2]. MFP applied to the inverse problem of estimating environmental parameters is typically referred to as matched-field inversion (MFI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%