2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00764-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of atmospheric trace metal emissions in Vilnius City, Lithuania, using vertical concentration gradient and road tunnel measurement data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past decade, a number of studies on atmospheric deposition trends of heavy metals in different areas were published [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Pb levels were reduced by about 25% during the period 1982-1995, and a slight decreasing trend was found for Co and Hg during the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, a number of studies on atmospheric deposition trends of heavy metals in different areas were published [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Pb levels were reduced by about 25% during the period 1982-1995, and a slight decreasing trend was found for Co and Hg during the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, the estimated EFs (g/km-veh) for CO and TNMCH based on the LLT data tend to be higher in comparison 82 5928 88-96 0.00% 144AE22 2217 The Fort McHenry Tunnel 90 26665 60-85 3.30% 230AE20 2199 À1.80% 147AE6 2211 The Gelizinis Vilkas Tunnel (Valiulis et al, 2002) 90 1800 3.04AE0.30 0.24AE0.16 0.18AE0.04 Fort McHenry Tunnel 3.95AE0.34 0.50AE0.06 0.39AE0.06 Taipei Tunnel (Hwa et al, 2002) 3.64AE0.26 0.9AE0.18 0.44AE0.06 Chung-Cheng Tunnel (Hsu et al, 2001) 6.25 1.02 1.51 Gubrist Tunnel (John et al, 1999) 4.18AE0.38 1.05AE0.09 0.46AE0.04 48 3.9 2.9 Fort McHenry Tunnel 56 4.9 7.8 Callahan Tunnel 45 9.2 4.5 Deck Park Tunnel (Gertler et al, 1997;Sagebiel et al, 1996) 45 8.4 6.1 Sepulveda Tunnel (Gertler et al, 1997;Sagebiel et al, 1996) 56 7.3 5.3 Lincoln Tunnel (Gertler et al, 1997) 39 10 5.2 Caldecott Tunnel (Ban-Weiss et al, 2008) 18 0.027 with other studies (except for the Chung-Cheng tunnel located in Taiwan), while NOx is between two and ten times lower. In the same way, Table 7 indicates that the LLT EFs (g/L) for CO and TNMHC are between two and four times higher, while the LLT NOx EF is comparable or up to half the value of other tunnel studies.…”
Section: Ef Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These two points, named "inlet" and "outlet," served as the limits of the control volume over which the mass balances were performed to estimate the corresponding mobile emissions. The distance between sampling points and between the "inlet" sampling point and the actual entrance to the tunnel ( Figure 2) were determined based on similar tunnel studies performed elsewhere (Valiulis et al, 2002;Cheng et al, 2010). Each sampling location was equipped with a Testo 435 device, which registered 1-min averages of CO 2 levels, temperature, relative humidity, and absolute pressure.…”
Section: Experimental Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling site representing Vilnius city was chosen in our previous investigations [10]. Daytime samples were collected between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. and night-time samples between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. One hour after the sampling period was set for the sample change.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%