2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Arctic glacier motion with satellite L-band SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can be used to overcome the limitations of D-InSAR in monitoring subsidence with a large deformation gradient. It has been successfully used to monitor the deformation due to earthquakes [23], volcanos [24], landslides [25], and the movement of glaciers [26,27]. There are two sub-pixel offset-tracking methods.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can be used to overcome the limitations of D-InSAR in monitoring subsidence with a large deformation gradient. It has been successfully used to monitor the deformation due to earthquakes [23], volcanos [24], landslides [25], and the movement of glaciers [26,27]. There are two sub-pixel offset-tracking methods.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the above-mentioned steps are done, the offset tracking technique is the same as for normal stripmap mode scenes [15][16][17][18][19]. Surface displacements can be obtained in ground coordinates (e.g., slant rage and azimuth directions), which are finally geocoded using a lookup table derived from the use of the DEM and the image parameter file.…”
Section: Gamma Remote Sensing Offset Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of interferometry to ascending and descending passes is also well documented for glacier surface velocity estimations [12][13][14]. There are plenty of articles dealing with glacier velocity retrieval using the offset tracking technique [15][16][17][18][19], including the particular case of Sentinel-1 TOPS acquisitions [20,21], the latter reference providing a comprehensive velocity field for the entire Greenland Ice Sheet. Furthermore, the combination of both techniques has also been covered with different approaches (e.g., merging of results or using least squares [22][23][24][25]) and also for entire ice sheets, such as the study by Mouginot et al [26] for the Antarctic Ice Sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even in these cases in situ measured glacier velocities are still of wide interest, since they provide a means for the calibration and validation of remotely sensed velocities (e.g. Strozzi et al, 2008;Schellenberger et al, 2015). This is of interest in view of the recent efforts to derive time series for regional or global icevelocity fields such as those involved in the MEaSUREs program (https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0484/versions/2, accessed on 7 May 2017), the GoLIVE project (https://nsidc.org/data/ golive, accessed on 7 May 2017), and the ENVEO CryoPortal (http://cryoportal.enveo.at/, accessed on 7 May 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). These islands, located off the north-western tip of the Antarctic Peninsula, previously had a scarce record of in situ velocity observations, which included measurements in the late 1980s on Nelson Island (Ren Jiaven et al, 1995), earlier measurements in the late 1990s on Johnsons Glacier (Ximenis et al, 1999), and measurements in the Arctowski Icefield, the Bellingshausen Dome, and the Central Dome of King George Island between 1999and 2008/09 (Blindow et al, 2010Rückamp et al, 2010Rückamp et al, , 2011. Such in situ velocity measurements are critical for the validation of the estimates of remote-sensor-based studies of ice discharge in the region such as those by Osmanoglu et al (2013Osmanoglu et al ( , 2014 for King George and Livingston islands (the present dataset has in fact been used in the latter paper with such purposes), as well as for tuning free parameters of glacier dynamics models, as done by Martín et al (2004) and Otero et al (2010) using an earlier (and shorter) version of the dataset presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%