2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in Japan (2): Comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus interception loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the precipitation varies under climate change, because the ratio of rainfall and snow would increase. Furthermore, the variations of meteorological parameters, e.g., temperature and humidity, may cause the changes in evapotranspiration (Cong et al, 2009;Shimizu et al, 2015), as well as river runoff and groundwater discharge in the water budget. Thus, the uncertainty of percentage of evapotranspiration, river runoff, and groundwater discharge in the total water budget may exist.…”
Section: Implication For Submarine Groundwater Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precipitation varies under climate change, because the ratio of rainfall and snow would increase. Furthermore, the variations of meteorological parameters, e.g., temperature and humidity, may cause the changes in evapotranspiration (Cong et al, 2009;Shimizu et al, 2015), as well as river runoff and groundwater discharge in the water budget. Thus, the uncertainty of percentage of evapotranspiration, river runoff, and groundwater discharge in the total water budget may exist.…”
Section: Implication For Submarine Groundwater Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data at Kiryu were estimated using the residuals between the monthly evapotranspiration by the short-term water budget method and observed interception loss. Data at Kahoku were estimated using the residuals between monthly evapotranspiration determined by the method of Shimizu et al (2015) and observed interception loss. …”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miyazaki Japanese cedar Sample size, tree-to-tree and radial variations Fujiyama et al 2005 * Fukuoka Japanese cypress DBH-Q T relationship Kumagai et al 2007 Kumamoto Japanese cedar Sample size, two slope positions Kumagai et al 2008 Kumamoto Japanese cedar Two slope positions, canopy conductance model Kume et al 2010a Fukuoka Japanese cypress Sample size, n 58 Komatsu et al 2013 Fukuoka Japanese cedar Thinning, Gc model Kumagai et al 2014 Kumamoto Japanese cedar Evapotranspiration components Shimizu et al 2015 Kumamoto Japanese cedar Eddy covariance, water balance Tsuruta et al 2015 Fukuoka Japanese cypress Difference in age between two stands Tateishi et al 2015…”
Section: Kyushu Conifermentioning
confidence: 99%