Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2723576.2723582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of ability from homework items when there are missing and/or multiple attempts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A built in assumption to such an approach is that higher ability students are likely to arrive at a correct response in fewer attempts than lower ability students. Earlier studies have confirmed this assumption empirically and shown that polytomous models can indeed result in more informative estimates than dichotomous models based only on first attempts (Bergner, Colvin, & Pritchard, ). Alternatively, multiple‐attempt information may come into play by modeling “recovery” after an incorrect attempt as a separate skill dimension (Culpepper, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A built in assumption to such an approach is that higher ability students are likely to arrive at a correct response in fewer attempts than lower ability students. Earlier studies have confirmed this assumption empirically and shown that polytomous models can indeed result in more informative estimates than dichotomous models based only on first attempts (Bergner, Colvin, & Pritchard, ). Alternatively, multiple‐attempt information may come into play by modeling “recovery” after an incorrect attempt as a separate skill dimension (Culpepper, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As described in Bergner et al. (), total scores often have low variance and pronounced ceiling effects when multiple attempts are allowed. We thus use proportion correct on first attempt, c 1 , as a classical measure of ability.…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, learners' performance is approached by visual feedback and analysis of graduate attributes that engages students with self‐assessment as part of their personal and professional development (Thompson, ). Furthermore, Okada and Tada () define a method for formative assessment specialized in experience‐based activities performed in real‐world learning sceneries; Xing, Wadholm, and Goggins () deploy an automated strategy to assess participation in a multimode discourse environment, where a clustering algorithm is applied according to the Activity Theory principles; Vogelsang and Ruppertz () apply a grading system, Cloud Teaching Assistant System, for automated validation in MOOCs, as well as an additional tool to instructor and peer grading; Vahdati, Lange, and Auern () assess the quality of open courses in terms of fitness to identify subjects to improve; Bergner, Colvin, and Pritchard () deal with a couple of issues related with scoring of student item response data from MOOCs, large amounts of missing data, and allowances for multiple attempts to answer.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they can be applied even with a large number of missing values. The potential of using item response theory in LA has been shown, for example, by Bergner et al (2015), who estimated student abilities based on homework scores from an MOOC in which a large number of scores were missing.…”
Section: Characteristics and Forms Of The Pisa Datamentioning
confidence: 99%