1964
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1964.1105690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of a system pulse transfer function in the presence of noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the OLS solution is identical to the maximum likelihood one (Mendel 1987). If the errors have a different distribution, this approach leads to a biased estimate of the solution vector (Levin 1964). The use of the Euclidean norm relates to the S in OLS: the sum of squares of residuals is minimized.…”
Section: The Solution Of An Over-determined System Of Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the OLS solution is identical to the maximum likelihood one (Mendel 1987). If the errors have a different distribution, this approach leads to a biased estimate of the solution vector (Levin 1964). The use of the Euclidean norm relates to the S in OLS: the sum of squares of residuals is minimized.…”
Section: The Solution Of An Over-determined System Of Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relations (11) and (12) are the basis for the Frisch method. They constitute a system of 2n + 1 equations in 2n + 2 unknowns.…”
Section: Three Variants Of the Frisch Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first solutions for the identification of dynamic EIV models was given in [11] and [1]. After these pioneer works, this topic has been reproposed by several authors with different approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier series techniques involve compounded approximations and do not afford a clear picture of the errors involved (3,4). Sampled-data techniques involve aliasing problems which also make errors difficult to evaluate (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). None of these methods clearly shows how close the result is to the best (in some prescribed sense) n th order rational function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%