2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of a non‐stationary prior covariance from seismic data

Abstract: Non‐stationarity in statistical properties of the subsurface is often ignored. In a classical linear Bayesian inversion setting of seismic data, the prior distribution of physical parameters is often assumed to be stationary. Here we propose a new method of handling non‐stationarity in the variance of physical parameters in seismic data. We propose to infer the model variance prior to inversion using maximum likelihood estimators in a sliding window approach. A traditional, and a localized shrinkage estimator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of quantifying representative geology is also present in the Gaussian case (Li et al 2015). Recent research involves the inclusion of non-stationarity (Sabeti et al 2017;Madsen et al 2020a) and multi-modality (Grana et al 2017;De Figueiredo et al 2019) while maintaining a computationally feasible problem (Zunino and Mosegaard 2019). MPS simulations are usually more computationally expensive than Gaussian simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of quantifying representative geology is also present in the Gaussian case (Li et al 2015). Recent research involves the inclusion of non-stationarity (Sabeti et al 2017;Madsen et al 2020a) and multi-modality (Grana et al 2017;De Figueiredo et al 2019) while maintaining a computationally feasible problem (Zunino and Mosegaard 2019). MPS simulations are usually more computationally expensive than Gaussian simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%