2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40300-016-0089-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation in constant-stress accelerated life tests for extension of the exponential distribution under progressive censoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior density function in (14) for the two parameters ψ and ζ can be formed by the multiplication of Equations (6) with (11) and making some simplification, and its final form is as below:…”
Section: Bayes Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The posterior density function in (14) for the two parameters ψ and ζ can be formed by the multiplication of Equations (6) with (11) and making some simplification, and its final form is as below:…”
Section: Bayes Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper aims to make a full study on the Lindley distribution under ALT using progressive Type II censored samples and apply an experimental application to introduce the importance of this distribution in fitting many real data applications in many fields of life. We refer to different recent studies to explain the difference kinds of ALT; for more reading about constant, step, and progressive ALT, see the works of El-din et al [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let t ij∶m i ∶n i = t ij be the observed values of the lifetime T obtained from a progressive type-II censoring under progressive-stress level S i (t), i = 1, 2, … , k and j = 1, 2, … , m i . From the CDF in (6) and the corresponding PDF in (7), the likelihood function of the 3 parameters , a, and b based on the progressive type-II censoring sample is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In constant-stress ALT, each unit is run at constant high stress until either all units fail or the test terminates. Constant-stress models were studied by several authors; see Kim and Bai, 2 Watkins and John, 3 Jaheen et al, 4 Guan et al, 5 and Mohie El-Din et al 6,7 In step-stress ALT, the stress on every unit is not fixed but is increasing step by step at prespecified times or simultaneous the occurrence of a fixed number of failures. The step-stress models were studied extensively in the literature; see, for instance, Miller and Nelson, 8 Bai et al, 9 Gouno et al, 10 Balakrishnan et al, 11 and Mohie El-Din et al [12][13][14] In progressive-stress ALT, the stress on each test unit is continuously increasing in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Nelson (1990) and Mohie El-Din et al (2016) for more details about constant-stress ALT. In step-stress ALT, the stress on every unit is not fixed but is increased step by step at prespecified times or simultaneous the occurrence of a fixed number of failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%