The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0205-19.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation for Better Inference in Neuroscience

Abstract: The estimation approach to inference emphasizes reporting effect sizes with expressions of uncertainty (interval estimates). In this perspective we explain the estimation approach and describe how it can help nudge neuroscientists toward a more productive research cycle by fostering better planning, more thoughtful interpretation, and more balanced evaluation of evidence.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a retrospective power analysis from the social isolation data obtained, using Glimmpse 48 , estimated a power of 0.83 to detect a genotype x drug interaction at p < 0.05 by ANOVA. Further, in accordance with recent and evolving recommendations 38,39,49 , we include information on the confidence intervals for the main effects, and also some preliminary Bayesian analysis. The use of Cauchy priors for the Bayesian analysis might be seen as over-conservative, considering the previous reports of hyperactivity and hyposociability phenotypes in 16p11.2 DEL mice 21,30,31,50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a retrospective power analysis from the social isolation data obtained, using Glimmpse 48 , estimated a power of 0.83 to detect a genotype x drug interaction at p < 0.05 by ANOVA. Further, in accordance with recent and evolving recommendations 38,39,49 , we include information on the confidence intervals for the main effects, and also some preliminary Bayesian analysis. The use of Cauchy priors for the Bayesian analysis might be seen as over-conservative, considering the previous reports of hyperactivity and hyposociability phenotypes in 16p11.2 DEL mice 21,30,31,50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need your feedback. Finally, there is another dimension to the estimation approach: the way we plan our research, which I leave you to discover in the Commentary (Calin-Jageman and Cumming, 2019) or the book.…”
Section: How To Move Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is linked to a Commentary published simultaneously (Calin-Jageman and Cumming, 2019), which describes the benefits of the estimation approach. When I was thinking to propose this change in the journal policy, I had a paper under revision at eNeuro (Manouze et al, 2019). I seized the opportunity to change the way I was reporting the results, using the estimation approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no basis for justifying an effect size, consider if one only need estimate (e.g. derive means and confidence or credibility intervals) to draw the inferences needed (Calin-Jageman, & Cumming, 2019;Cumming & Calin-Jageman, 2017;Gelman, Carlin, Stern, Dunson, et al, 2013;McElreath, 2016;Rothman & Greenland, 2018;Wagenmakers, Marsman, Jamil, Ly et al, 2018). Remember that if estimation is used, it gives no grounds for asserting H0; one can only say the effect is (or is probably) between certain bounds.…”
Section: The Rough Scale Of Effect Predictedmentioning
confidence: 99%