Estimating tree species diversity in the savannah using NDVI and woody canopy cover

Abstract

Remote sensing applications in biodiversity research often rely on the establishment of relationships between spectral information from the image and tree species diversity measured in the field. Most studies have used normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to estimate tree species diversity on the basis that it is sensitive to primary productivity which defines spatial variation in plant diversity. The NDVI signal is influenced by photosynthetically active vegetation which, in the savannah, includes woody canopy foliage and grasses. The question is whether the relationship between NDVI and tree species diversity in the savanna depends on the woody cover percentage. This study explored the relationship between woody canopy cover (WCC) and tree species diversity in the savannah woodland of southern Africa and also investigated whether there is a significant interaction between seasonal NDVI and WCC in the factorial model when estimating tree species diversity. To fulfil our aim, we followed stratified random sampling approach and surveyed tree species in 68 plots of 90m X 90m across the study area. Within each plot, all trees with diameter at breast height of >10cm were sampled and Shannon index-a common measure of species diversity which considers both species richness and abundance-was used to This article was published in JAG: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243417302568 quantify tree species diversity. We then extracted WCC in each plot from existing fractional woody cover product produced from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. Factorial regression model was used to determine the interaction effect between NDVI and WCC when estimating tree species diversity. Results from regression analysis showed that (i) WCC has a highly significant relationship with tree species diversity (r 2 = 0.21; p < 0.01), (ii) the interaction between the NDVI and WCC is not significant, however, the factorial model significantly reduced the error of prediction (RMSE = 0.47, p <0.05) compared to NDVI (RMSE = 0.49) or WCC (RMSE = 0.49) model during the senescence period. The result justifies our assertion that combining NDVI with WCC will be optimal for biodiversity estimation during the senescence period.

Deep Learning Approaches for the Mapping of Tree Species Diversity in a Tropical Wetland Using Airborne LiDAR and High-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing Images

“…Traditional biodiversity measurement is often conducted by field work or monitoring systems [4]. However, these means cannot provide spatially distributed and updated information [5]. Remote sensing techniques can solve this problem and have been used for biodiversity monitoring, as they can cover large areas of multiple spatial scales [6][7][8][9].…”

Efficiency of Extreme Gradient Boosting for Imbalanced Land Cover Classification Using an Extended Margin and Disagreement Performance

“…As long as the training samples are derived from the images to be classified, the DN values can be applied to single date image classification [47]. In addition, 8 second-order texture metrics (mean, variance, To quantify the complexity and diversity of the study areas, Shannon Diversity Index (SHDI), a common measure of species diversity that considers both species richness and abundance [45], are used. In order to conduct random sampling, evaluate the performance and calculate the area complexity, we make a reference data using the criteria above and manual interpretation.…”

Change in Biophysical Parameters from the Creation of a Natural Monument in Mato Grosso

“…Liesenberg et al (2007) and Gillespie et al (2018) show that the NDVI and EVI profile is consistent with the seasonal dynamics of the vegetation. Madonsela et al (2018) working with the NDVI in the savanna forest of Southern Africa found 0.49 during the senescence period. The high value of NDVI can also be explained by the large number of semi-deciduous species (Hermuche, 2011).…”