1997
DOI: 10.1109/34.589202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the viewing parameters of random, noisy projections of asymmetric objects for tomographic reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common-line method is another reference-free algorithm based on the property that two projections of the same object from different directions must share a common line in Fourier space (Central-Slice Theorem). The search of the common line can be done by comparing the projection sinograms in the image space (Goncharov, 1990;Penczek et al, 1994;van Heel, 1987) or in the Fourier space (Goncharov, 1990;Lauren and Nandhakumar, 1997). The approach of Lauren and Nandhakumar (1997) is particularly interesting since shifts and noise are explicitly considered during the commonline search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common-line method is another reference-free algorithm based on the property that two projections of the same object from different directions must share a common line in Fourier space (Central-Slice Theorem). The search of the common line can be done by comparing the projection sinograms in the image space (Goncharov, 1990;Penczek et al, 1994;van Heel, 1987) or in the Fourier space (Goncharov, 1990;Lauren and Nandhakumar, 1997). The approach of Lauren and Nandhakumar (1997) is particularly interesting since shifts and noise are explicitly considered during the commonline search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can classify all the techniques for the angular assignment into two groups: referencefree [5,6,8,9,12,14,16,18] and reference-based [7,10,11,13,15,17]. The goal of the reference-based methods is to refine a particle assignment with respect to a reference volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D model of a particle is usually computed from its EM images in a twostep procedure. First, the in-plane coordinates of the center of the particle as well as its in-plane and out-of-plane rotations are determined and assigned to each particle image [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Second, a reconstruction algorithm is applied to compute the 3D model using the particle images and the previous angular and translational assignment [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only expected to work well when the initial point is in the neighborhood of the optimal solution. A similar problem has been studied in the field of tomography when the rotation corresponding to a projection is not known [14,15]. In [15], the authors dealt with imaging noise using self consistency between four projections.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, in the tilted configuration, several images of the specimen are acquired by rotating the stage supporting the carbon film about a known axis by known angular increments. In this paper we focus our attention to the reconstruction of 3D density using a single exposure at zero tilt [5,6,10,15,19,20,22].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%