2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the value of electricity storage in PJM: Arbitrage and some welfare effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
326
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
326
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A large share of the existing PBUC work assumes perfect foresight of future prices and the storage plant to be small enough to be a price-taker in the considered market (e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23]). Although quite some studies discuss a relaxation of the perfect price foresight assumption (e.g., [16,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]), less attention has been given to the relaxation of the price-taking assumption in PBUC arbitrage models. However, either large-scale or multiple small-scale storage plants that are operated cooperatively could benefit from considering the price-effect of (dis)charge actions.…”
Section: Scope and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A large share of the existing PBUC work assumes perfect foresight of future prices and the storage plant to be small enough to be a price-taker in the considered market (e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23]). Although quite some studies discuss a relaxation of the perfect price foresight assumption (e.g., [16,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]), less attention has been given to the relaxation of the price-taking assumption in PBUC arbitrage models. However, either large-scale or multiple small-scale storage plants that are operated cooperatively could benefit from considering the price-effect of (dis)charge actions.…”
Section: Scope and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arbitrage application is widely discussed in the literature, both from a system (e.g., [10][11][12][13][14][15]) and from an individual storage plant's PBUC perspective, the latter being the focus of this article. Generally, there are two important assumptions in PBUC arbitrage models: the first is related to the storage operator's assumed knowledge of future prices, i.e., the (im)perfect price foresight assumption, while the second is related to whether they recognize that their (dis)charge actions may affect those prices, i.e., the price-taking or price-making assumption [16,17]. A large share of the existing PBUC work assumes perfect foresight of future prices and the storage plant to be small enough to be a price-taker in the considered market (e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23]).…”
Section: Scope and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a purely theoretical framework, the operation of storage is able to decouple the load from the generation, and reduce the electricity cost for consumers (Crampes and Moreaux, 2010;Sioshansi et al, 2009;Weissensteiner et al, 2011). However, this is challenging to explicitly examine, as the electricity price often consists of various elements and the methodology is not uniform through different markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%