2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the spatial coverage of citizen science for monitoring threatened species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Citizen science has become an important method in ecological and biodiversity research (Dickinson et al ., 2010; Ellwood et al ., 2017; McKinley et al ., 2017) from short‐term 1‐day ‘bioblitzes’ (Parker et al ., 2018; Aristeidou et al ., 2021) to long‐term species monitoring programmes (Chandler et al ., 2017; Lloyd et al ., 2020). Citizen science has broadened research scope and capacity, but also strengthened the relationship between the public, the natural world and the scientific process (Schuttler et al ., 2018; Adler et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen science has become an important method in ecological and biodiversity research (Dickinson et al ., 2010; Ellwood et al ., 2017; McKinley et al ., 2017) from short‐term 1‐day ‘bioblitzes’ (Parker et al ., 2018; Aristeidou et al ., 2021) to long‐term species monitoring programmes (Chandler et al ., 2017; Lloyd et al ., 2020). Citizen science has broadened research scope and capacity, but also strengthened the relationship between the public, the natural world and the scientific process (Schuttler et al ., 2018; Adler et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the outcomes of citizen science projects show a strict correlation between human population density and data distribution (Johnston et al, 2020, Lloyd et al, 2020. In our case, it is almost impossible to find global data on the distribution of scubadivers, which activity is likely variable during the year and who are not strictly limited to their area of residence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Finally, community science data in general have been critiqued for being biased toward areas with higher human activity (Chandler et al, 2017; Lloyd et al, 2020; Theobald et al, 2015). Nevertheless, when analyses account for species and spatial bias, community science is a valuable tool for conservation (McKinley et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%