2009
DOI: 10.1121/1.3242346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue® microbubbles using light scattering

Abstract: Experiments were performed to measure the dynamical response of individual SonoVue microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound. Three commonly used bubble dynamic models (i.e., Hoff's, Sarkar's, and linearized Marmottant's models) were compared to determine the most appropriate model for fitting to the experimental data. The models were evaluated against published optical microscopy data. The comparison suggests that it is difficult to rank these models for lipid-shelled microbubbles undergoing small-amplitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
123
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symbols description and the values used in the simulation are shown in Table 2. The coated microbubble shell viscosity μ S and shell elasticity χ parameters values were taken from [29,30].…”
Section: Mehranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbols description and the values used in the simulation are shown in Table 2. The coated microbubble shell viscosity μ S and shell elasticity χ parameters values were taken from [29,30].…”
Section: Mehranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the MB radius changes during US-induced oscillation, the viscoelastic properties of the MB shell may be altered (Tu et al 2009;van der Meer et al 2007) due to the compaction or rarefaction of its constituent molecules. Marmottant et al (2005) suggest that μ s scales with the inverse of the current bubble radius a according to…”
Section: Analytical Mb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kg/s and χ = 0.3 N/m for the phospholipid shell [13]. The bubble radius at equilibrium, R 0 , is chosen as 1.7 µm, since the average bubble radius drops down to below 2 µm after few minutes of decantation [14].…”
Section: B Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%