2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the safety benefit of separated cycling infrastructure adjusted for behavioral adaptation among drivers; an application of agent-based modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, much of the success is attributed to substantial investment in public education, behaviour-change, and enforcement activities 52 whose impact now appears to be waning as reductions in aggregate and per capita injuries plateau, or are even beginning to increase again. 17,53,54 The findings from this study suggest that more upstream investment in urban design that supports transport mode shift away from motor vehicles and into lower risk modes such as rail 1,4,55 or safe active transport (ie, where separated or protected infrastructure is provided) 56 can be harnessed to deliver reductions in transport injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, much of the success is attributed to substantial investment in public education, behaviour-change, and enforcement activities 52 whose impact now appears to be waning as reductions in aggregate and per capita injuries plateau, or are even beginning to increase again. 17,53,54 The findings from this study suggest that more upstream investment in urban design that supports transport mode shift away from motor vehicles and into lower risk modes such as rail 1,4,55 or safe active transport (ie, where separated or protected infrastructure is provided) 56 can be harnessed to deliver reductions in transport injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a series of ABMs, Thompson et al [14][15][16] That is, at specific times and locations where cyclist density is high, the movement of motor-vehicles (and potential collisions) is restricted because time gaps between cyclists are smaller and more likely to be rejected by drivers. At specific locations and times when cyclist density is low, time-gaps are larger and more likely to be accepted by drivers, resulting in higher per-capita collision risk as drivers and cyclists more frequently interact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible that the strength of the original findings may have led to a subsequent degree of observer dependence, whereby data collection has largely continued to follow existing theory focused on 'numbers' of cyclists across a system rather than alternative spatial mechanisms as described here. Instead, the synthetic evidence collected from ABMs [14][15][16] has enabled a new perspective on the way we could collect observational data [29] related to cycling safety that has been operationalised in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations