2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16204054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Responses of Hydrological and Sedimental Processes to Future Climate Change in Watersheds with Different Landscapes in the Yellow River Basin, China

Abstract: This study concerned the sediment issue of the Yellow River basin. The responses of hydrological and sedimental processes to future climate change in two upland watersheds with different dominant landscapes were estimated. Four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios with different radiative forcing levels were considered. The outputs of eleven Global Climate Models (GCMs) were used to represent the future climate status of the 2050s and 2070s, and an ensemble means was achieved to avoid uncertain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the K-S tests show that there was no significant difference between the distributions of the daily observed and modeled series for all weather factors. The t-test and F-test results show that the means and variances of the monthly observed series and synthetic series were in good agreement, if a little poorer than the corresponding daily outputs, and comparable with the level of agreement in other model applications [56,59,60]. Most monthly results had no significant differences between the observed and modeled values at the 5% significance level, except the F-test of monthly precipitation variance in September.…”
Section: Results Of the Lars-wgsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The results of the K-S tests show that there was no significant difference between the distributions of the daily observed and modeled series for all weather factors. The t-test and F-test results show that the means and variances of the monthly observed series and synthetic series were in good agreement, if a little poorer than the corresponding daily outputs, and comparable with the level of agreement in other model applications [56,59,60]. Most monthly results had no significant differences between the observed and modeled values at the 5% significance level, except the F-test of monthly precipitation variance in September.…”
Section: Results Of the Lars-wgsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The GWLF/ReNuMa model performed well in estimating the yields and source apportionments of watershed streamflows and pollution fluxes (Hu et al 2018;Liu et al 2018). Based on various scenario analyses, the valid GWLF/ReNuMa model can be used to support best management practices (Qi et al 2020) and estimate the impacts of possible climate change on watershed hydrochemical processes (Li et al 2019;Sha et al 2021b). In this study, we used GWLF to model the hydrochemical processes of SDRW to estimate the monthly/annual streamflow and TDN loads in the present and future.…”
Section: Watershed Hydrochemical Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%