Abstract:The complexities of the interactions between long-and short-wave radiation fluxes and the human body make it inherently difficult to estimate precisely the total radiation absorbed (R) by a human in an outdoor environment. The purpose of this project was to assess and compare three methods to estimate the radiation absorbed by a human in an outdoor environment, and to compare the impact of applying various skin and clothing albedos (α h ) on R. Field tests were conducted under both clear and overcast skies to … Show more
“…1) is a copper cylinder (10-cm height and 1.0-cm diameter) filled with conductive epoxy with a copper-constantan thermocouple inserted in the middle. It is designed to have the representative geometry (cylinder) and radiational properties of an average clothed human (albedo of 0.39 and emissivity of 0.95) (Brown and Gillespie 1986;Kenny et al 2008; Monteith 1973). The CRT measures a value of radiant temperature that is then used to provide a value of R abs (Wm −2 ), which is an integration of the total solar and terrestrial radiation fluxes that are absorbed by a cylindrical body (Kenny et al 2008).…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of all short-and long-wave radiant fluxes in a given point location results in a mean radiant temperature (T mrt ) Kenny et al 2008), which is the most significant heat gain to urban surfaces and human heat load on warm-hot days. Therefore, accurate radiation monitoring or modeling is required for assessing the thermal environment's influence on human heat stress.…”
Given the predominant use of heat-retaining materials in urban areas, numerous studies have addressed the urban heat island mitigation potential of various "cool" options, such as vegetation and high-albedo surfaces. The influence of altered radiational properties of such surfaces affects not only the air temperature within a microclimate, but more importantly the interactions of long-and shortwave radiation fluxes with the human body. Minimal studies have assessed how cool surfaces affect thermal comfort via changes in absorbed radiation by a human (R abs ) using real-world, rather than modeled, urban field data. The purpose of the current study is to assess the changes in the absorbed radiation by a human-a critical component of human energy budget models-based on surface type on hot summer days (air temperatures >38.5 • C). Field tests were conducted using a high-end microclimate station under predominantly clear sky conditions over ten surfaces with higher sky view factors in Lubbock, Texas. Three methods were used to measure and estimate R abs : a cylindrical radiation thermometer (CRT), a net radiometer, and a theoretical estimation model. Results over dry surfaces suggest that the use of high-albedo surfaces to reduce overall urban heat gain may not improve acute human thermal comfort in clear conditions due to increased reflected radiation. Further, the use of low-cost instrumentation, such as the CRT, shows potential in quantifying radiative heat loads within urban areas at temporal scales of 5-10 min or greater, yet further research is needed. Fine-scale radiative information in urban areas can aid in the decision-making process for urban heat mitigation using non-vegetated urban surfaces, with surface type choice is dependent on the need for short-term thermal comfort, or reducing cumulative heat gain to the urban fabric.
“…1) is a copper cylinder (10-cm height and 1.0-cm diameter) filled with conductive epoxy with a copper-constantan thermocouple inserted in the middle. It is designed to have the representative geometry (cylinder) and radiational properties of an average clothed human (albedo of 0.39 and emissivity of 0.95) (Brown and Gillespie 1986;Kenny et al 2008; Monteith 1973). The CRT measures a value of radiant temperature that is then used to provide a value of R abs (Wm −2 ), which is an integration of the total solar and terrestrial radiation fluxes that are absorbed by a cylindrical body (Kenny et al 2008).…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of all short-and long-wave radiant fluxes in a given point location results in a mean radiant temperature (T mrt ) Kenny et al 2008), which is the most significant heat gain to urban surfaces and human heat load on warm-hot days. Therefore, accurate radiation monitoring or modeling is required for assessing the thermal environment's influence on human heat stress.…”
Given the predominant use of heat-retaining materials in urban areas, numerous studies have addressed the urban heat island mitigation potential of various "cool" options, such as vegetation and high-albedo surfaces. The influence of altered radiational properties of such surfaces affects not only the air temperature within a microclimate, but more importantly the interactions of long-and shortwave radiation fluxes with the human body. Minimal studies have assessed how cool surfaces affect thermal comfort via changes in absorbed radiation by a human (R abs ) using real-world, rather than modeled, urban field data. The purpose of the current study is to assess the changes in the absorbed radiation by a human-a critical component of human energy budget models-based on surface type on hot summer days (air temperatures >38.5 • C). Field tests were conducted using a high-end microclimate station under predominantly clear sky conditions over ten surfaces with higher sky view factors in Lubbock, Texas. Three methods were used to measure and estimate R abs : a cylindrical radiation thermometer (CRT), a net radiometer, and a theoretical estimation model. Results over dry surfaces suggest that the use of high-albedo surfaces to reduce overall urban heat gain may not improve acute human thermal comfort in clear conditions due to increased reflected radiation. Further, the use of low-cost instrumentation, such as the CRT, shows potential in quantifying radiative heat loads within urban areas at temporal scales of 5-10 min or greater, yet further research is needed. Fine-scale radiative information in urban areas can aid in the decision-making process for urban heat mitigation using non-vegetated urban surfaces, with surface type choice is dependent on the need for short-term thermal comfort, or reducing cumulative heat gain to the urban fabric.
“…Such measures typically portray radiant effects using the mean radiant temperature (MRT), which is difficult to quantify in an outdoor urban context due to the multiplicity of radiating surfaces together with the high intensity of solar and atmospheric radiation. Although the measurement of MRT using globe thermometers of varying diameters and materials has received wide attention in recent studies (Ali-Toudert and Mayer, 2006Mayer, , 2007Thorsson et al, 2007;Kenny et al, 2008), this approach is still subject to uncertainties given the extreme variability of air flow and convective heat transfer that is typical in the urban canopy layer.…”
ABSTRACT:The effects of vegetation on human thermal stress in a hot-arid region were tested in two semi-enclosed urban spaces with various combinations of mature trees, grass, overhead shading mesh and paving. The index of thermal stress was calculated hourly from measured meteorological data in the studied sites to evaluate thermal comfort in the different spaces based on radiative and convective pedestrian-environment energy exchanges and sweat efficiency, and expressed on a thermal sensation scale ranging from 'comfortable' to 'very hot'. The efficiency of water use in providing improved comfort was gauged for each of the vegetative landscaping treatments by comparing the total evapotranspiration with the reduction in thermal stress, both expressed in terms of their values in equivalent energy. While conditions in a paved, unshaded courtyard were found to be uncomfortable throughout the daytime hours (with half of these hours defined by severe discomfort), each of the landscape treatments made a clear contribution to improved thermal comfort. With shading, either by trees or mesh, discomfort was reduced in duration by over half and limited in maximum severity when the shading was placed above paving. When combined with grass, both shading mechanisms yielded comfortable conditions at all hours. In both cases, the effect of trees was more pronounced than that of the mesh, but by a small margin. With unshaded grass, 'hot' conditions in the courtyard were restricted to a short period in mid-afternoon, a considerable improvement over unshaded paving, attributable mainly to the lower radiant surface temperatures.
“…Radiation was measured using a cylindrical radiation thermometer (CRT) (Kenny et al 2008) and a CNR1 net radiometer (Model CNR1; Kipp & Konen, Delft, Netherlands). The CNR1 net radiometer provided separate measurements for all four radiation flux components (K T , K r , L a , and L g ) and was secured on a mobile stand (PCS-1; Parktool, USA).…”
Section: Field Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods outlined by Kenny et al (2008) were used to convert the CRT measurements to the radiation absorbed by a human.…”
This study assessed the performance of the COMFA outdoor thermal comfort model on subjects performing moderate to vigorous physical activity. Field tests were conducted on 27 subjects performing 30 min of steady-state activity (walking, running, and cycling) in an outdoor environment. The predicted COMFA budgets were compared to the actual thermal sensation (ATS) votes provided by participants during each 5-min interval. The results revealed a normal distribution in the subjects' ATS votes, with 82% of votes received in categories 0 (neutral) to +2 (warm). The ATS votes were significantly dependent upon sex, air temperature, short and long-wave radiation, wind speed, and metabolic activity rate. There was a significant positive correlation between the ATS and predicted budgets (Spearman's rho=0.574, P<0.01). However, the predicted budgets did not display a normal distribution, and the model produced erroneous estimates of the heat and moisture exchange between the human body and the ambient environment in 6% of the cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.