2019
DOI: 10.1177/0962280219882968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the quantile medical cost under time-dependent covariates and right censored time-to-event variable based on a state process

Abstract: Estimating the medical costs from disease diagnosis to a terminal event is of immense interest to researchers. However, most of existing literature on such research focused on the estimation of cumulative mean function (CMF) for history process. In this paper, the combined scheme of both inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) technique and longitudinal quantile regression model is used to develop a novel procedure to the estimation of cumulative quantile function (CQF) based on history process with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We implement EAW estimator among Q (1) 𝜏 (y i (t)|x i (t)) and Q (2) 𝜏 (y i (t)|x i (t), u i ) in ( 16) with 50 independent splits (the smoothing parameters h=1 and a(h) = 0.01). Table 5 lists the estimated 5-year and total treatment period cumulative quantile costs under 𝜏 = 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75, and explains similar features with those in Liu et al 8 Note that the fitted residuals (marked by "Res" in Table 5) illustrate that additive quantile mixed effect model (AQMM) is more suitable as it contributes the between-subject variability by means of random effects, the change of cumulative costs is relatively flat among various quantile levels. On the other hand, EAW estimator based on either Liu et al or AQMM could maintain the optimistic result among different probability levels, while candidate models performs differently.…”
Section: Madit Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We implement EAW estimator among Q (1) 𝜏 (y i (t)|x i (t)) and Q (2) 𝜏 (y i (t)|x i (t), u i ) in ( 16) with 50 independent splits (the smoothing parameters h=1 and a(h) = 0.01). Table 5 lists the estimated 5-year and total treatment period cumulative quantile costs under 𝜏 = 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75, and explains similar features with those in Liu et al 8 Note that the fitted residuals (marked by "Res" in Table 5) illustrate that additive quantile mixed effect model (AQMM) is more suitable as it contributes the between-subject variability by means of random effects, the change of cumulative costs is relatively flat among various quantile levels. On the other hand, EAW estimator based on either Liu et al or AQMM could maintain the optimistic result among different probability levels, while candidate models performs differently.…”
Section: Madit Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Without loss of generality, we assume that censoring time is independent of terminal time and the history process for each subject. In the light of Liu et al., 8 the τth quantile state function ( τ-QSF) of (4) at time t is defined as H τ false( t false) = Q τ false( y false( t false) | bold-italicx false( t false) , bold-italicz false( t false) , bold-italicu false). We combine the inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) method with EAW estimator equation (6) to estimate τ-QSF that where K false^ false( t false) = K ^ 1 false( t false) K ^ 2 false( t false), K ^ l false( t false) false( l = 1 , 2 false) are corresponding Kaplan–Meier estimators of K 1 false( t false) and K 2 false( t false), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations