1998
DOI: 10.2307/2670061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Number of Classes in a Finite Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard trick described in [18] improves on (2) and also the two other estimators. The idea is to separate the observed haplotypes into two groups: abundant and rare .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard trick described in [18] improves on (2) and also the two other estimators. The idea is to separate the observed haplotypes into two groups: abundant and rare .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is no known efficient (i.e., sampling-based) method to estimate a priori the number of rows in an agg-tablei.e., the number of groups that the query's GROUP BY clause produces-with guaranteed error bounds [10]. However, by carefully defining the estimation problem, we can sidestep these issues so that a sampling-based technique will meet our needs.…”
Section: Query Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiently predicting the working set size of a query, e.g, by sampling, is a non-trivial problem. For example, with a group-by query, if we adopt a simple bound on the working set -the number of distinct group-by values, we have to solve the infamous sample-based distinct count estimation problem [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimators of species richness may differ in sensitivity to the sampling design due to differential reliance on the number and relative incidence of species observed in a sample (Haas & Stokes, 1998;Mao & Lindsay, 2007;Walther & Morand, 1998); thus the four estimators can only provide an example of how the sample design and choice of sampling unit can affect estimators of richness. On the other hand, their appeal to forest tree species richness estimation will increase if they also demonstrate insensitivity to the design for sample collection (EQ, STR, SRS) and choice of sampling unit (CLU, T1).…”
Section: Estimators Of Species Richnessmentioning
confidence: 99%