SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13948717.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the magnetization direction of magnetic bodies through correlation between reduced-to-the-pole anomaly and the normalized source strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these transformations is related to the reduced-to-pole (RTP) anomaly, which is sensitive to the assumed magnetization directions; the other transform is related to some magnetic quantities that are weakly sensitive to the directions of the source magnetization, such as total gradient (Nabighian, 1972;Roest et al, 1992), amplitude data T a (Stavrev and Gerovska, 2000), and normalized source strength (NSS) (Wilson, 1985). Several combinations of these two types of anomalies have been published, e.g., the vertical derivative of the RTP anomaly (RTP z ) and the total gradient of the RTP anomaly (RTP xyz ) (Dannemiller and Li, 2006), the RTP anomaly and T a (Gerovska et al, 2009), and the RTP anomaly and NSS (Rao et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017). Considering that the two types of anomalies should have the same decay rates with the distance to the source (Dannemiller and , RTP z may be a better choice than RTP when combined with NSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these transformations is related to the reduced-to-pole (RTP) anomaly, which is sensitive to the assumed magnetization directions; the other transform is related to some magnetic quantities that are weakly sensitive to the directions of the source magnetization, such as total gradient (Nabighian, 1972;Roest et al, 1992), amplitude data T a (Stavrev and Gerovska, 2000), and normalized source strength (NSS) (Wilson, 1985). Several combinations of these two types of anomalies have been published, e.g., the vertical derivative of the RTP anomaly (RTP z ) and the total gradient of the RTP anomaly (RTP xyz ) (Dannemiller and Li, 2006), the RTP anomaly and T a (Gerovska et al, 2009), and the RTP anomaly and NSS (Rao et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017). Considering that the two types of anomalies should have the same decay rates with the distance to the source (Dannemiller and , RTP z may be a better choice than RTP when combined with NSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%