2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the impacts of climate change on crop yields and N2O emissions for conventional and no-tillage in Southwestern Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for CC ( R 2 = 0.40 and EF = 0.35, Table 1) were better than previously reported for Woodslee by Liu et al (2010) ( R 2 = 0.36 and EF = −0.70) with the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)‐Crop Environment Resource Synthesis (CERES)‐Maize model. Simulations over shorter time periods (4–6 yr) have shown better agreement with observed yield for the Woodslee site (Liu et al, 2014; He et al, 2017). However, our RMSE values are slightly better than obtained with the crop model BioStar in Germany (2.1 Mg ha −1 ) for corn yield (Bauböck, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results for CC ( R 2 = 0.40 and EF = 0.35, Table 1) were better than previously reported for Woodslee by Liu et al (2010) ( R 2 = 0.36 and EF = −0.70) with the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)‐Crop Environment Resource Synthesis (CERES)‐Maize model. Simulations over shorter time periods (4–6 yr) have shown better agreement with observed yield for the Woodslee site (Liu et al, 2014; He et al, 2017). However, our RMSE values are slightly better than obtained with the crop model BioStar in Germany (2.1 Mg ha −1 ) for corn yield (Bauböck, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The DNDC model has been tested for its ability to predict soil temperature, soil water content, soil N content, and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions at experimental sites in eastern and western Canada (Smith et al, 2002, 2008). It has also been employed in multimodel comparisons for crop production and N 2 O emissions (Ehrhardt et al, 2017) and C dynamics (Smith et al, 2012, Grant et al, 2016), along with assessing the effects of climate change on crop production (Smith et al, 2013, He et al, 2017). These investigations have prompted the development of improved model processes for the Canadian version of DNDC (DNDC v.CAN) including crop biomass growth (Kröbel et al, 2011), evapotranspiration (Dutta et al, 2016b), soil temperature (Dutta et al, 2017), ammonia volatilization after slurry application (Congreves et al, 2016), and ammonia emissions after urea application (Dutta et al, 2016a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil NO 3 -contents were relatively well predicted particularly for wheat in NT and CT, whereas soil NO 3 -contents in vetch were underestimated in NT and CT. These inaccuracies in soil N mineral content were previously observed by He et al (2017) and Abdalla et al (2014). They explained that the poor DNDC model performance of soil mineral N was due to the flaws in soil water balance module (a simple cascade approach) that could affect the water and nutrient upward flow and downward infiltration, especially under dry soil conditions where preferential flow through cracks can occur after rainfall when soil was dry.…”
Section: Crop Yield and Yield-scaled N 2 O Emissions In Conservation mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Recently, He et al, (2017) reported that the DNDC model overestimated the SWC for NT and CT treatments in a clay loam soil during dry conditions, due to the incapacity of DNDC model to transport preferential water flow into the soil profile through clay cracks (Uzoma et al, 2015). Also, …”
Section: Evaluation Of Soil Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%