Estimating the impact of COVID-19 vaccine allocation inequities: a modeling study

Abstract

Access to COVID-19 vaccines on the global scale has been drastically impacted by structural socio-economic inequities. Here, we develop a data-driven, age-stratified epidemic model to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 vaccine inequities in twenty lower middle and low income countries (LMIC) sampled from all WHO regions. We focus on the first critical months of vaccine distribution and administration, exploring counterfactual scenarios where we assume the same per capita daily vaccination rate reported in selected high income countries. We estimate that, in this high vaccine availability scenario, more than 50% of deaths (min-max range: 56%-99%) that occurred in the analyzed countries could have been averted. We further consider a scenario where LMIC had similarly early access to vaccine doses as high income countries; even without increasing the number of doses, we estimate an important fraction of deaths (min-max range: 7%-73%) could have been averted. In the absence of equitable allocation, the model suggests that considerable additional non-pharmaceutical interventions would have been required to offset the lack of vaccines (min-max range: 15%-75%). Overall, our results quantify the negative impacts of vaccines inequities and call for amplified global efforts to provide better access to vaccine programs in low and lower middle income countries

Risk of COVID‐19 death for people with a pre‐existing cancer diagnosis prior to COVID‐19‐vaccination: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Moreover, the increased risk of COVID‐19‐related death for people with recently diagnosed/treated cancers confirms the need to consider these groups for prioritization of COVID‐19‐vaccination in settings with limited vaccine availability. In particular, there have been substantial inequities in vaccine availability between countries, with ~33% of people in low‐ and middle‐income countries not having received a COVID‐19 vaccine and ~40% not fully vaccinated as of 28 August 2023 9,55 . Subject to differences between different SARS‐CoV‐2 variants, the results of this review remain relevant in settings without sufficiently widespread, effective COVID‐19 vaccination.…”

Estimating social contact rates for the COVID-19 pandemic using Google mobility and pre-pandemic contact surveys

“…An example of this would be going on a date: the amount of social contact you might have during a date may not strongly depend upon how many other people are going on dates. The “mobility squared” model (13,14) assumes that, given a visit is made to a particular type of venue, the number of contacts depends upon the number of other people making visits to the same type of venue. An example of this might be using public transport, where your risk might depend upon how many other people are using public transport.…”

Promoting Fair Vaccination Strategies through Influence Maximization: A Case Study on COVID-19 Spread

“…Commonly, works that do consider social contact often do not consider fairness implications (Jiangzuo et al 2021). Much research considers how to optimize the age-based vaccination approach, but often other sensitive attributes are not considered (Wu, Wang, and Xu 2022;Sheldrick, Meyerowitz-Katz, and Tucker-Kellogg 2022;Kirwin et al 2021;Ferranna, Cadarette, and Bloom 2021;Gozzi et al 2022;Sheldrick, Meyerowitz-Katz, and Tucker-Kellogg 2022;Jentsch, Anand, and Bauch 2021;Buckner, Chowell, and Springborn 2021).…”