2022
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the impact of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison

Abstract: Background Quantitative estimates of collateral resistance induced by antibiotic use are scarce. Objectives To estimate the effects of treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefazolin, compared with cefuroxime, on future resistance to ceftazidime among hospitalized patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with positive bacterial cultures hosp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relatively low aORs obtained for cephalosporins might be due to the aggregation of different cephalosporins administered to patients. 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins are more widely used in the studied hospital, and are expected to confer lower resistance to ceftazidime, compared to 3rd generation cephalosporins [8,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relatively low aORs obtained for cephalosporins might be due to the aggregation of different cephalosporins administered to patients. 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins are more widely used in the studied hospital, and are expected to confer lower resistance to ceftazidime, compared to 3rd generation cephalosporins [8,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each use of an antibiotic drug depletes its future effectiveness due to antibiotic resistance [21, 22, 23, 27]. We assume that each use of a drug in the current period detracts its average effectiveness in the following period by a constant depletion effect, which may vary between drugs [26]. Formally, let be the initial effectiveness levels of drugs B, N respectively, where (i.e., the broad-spectrum drug is more likely to be effective).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each use of an antibiotic increases the future resistance to it, and thus decreases its effectiveness [21, 22, 23]. In principle, each antibiotic treatment also exposes the patient to risks such as treatment side effects or increased likelihood of developing other, antibiotic resistant bacterial infections [24, 25, 26, 27]. Nonetheless, for simplicity, and since these risks are low relative to the immediate risk of not clearing the infection, we neglect these them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such inappropriate empirical treatment is associated with the prevalence of AMR 4 . Despite guidelines 5 , literature on collateral damage of antibiotics 5 , 6 , and stewardship initiatives 7 , the frequency of bug-drug mismatch in empiric treatment often remains high 4 , 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%