Estimating the greenhouse gas footprint of Knorr

Abstract

Purpose Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been identified as one of Unilever's priority environmental impact themes: this assessment was therefore conducted to help the Knorr brand measure and understand the GHG emissions related to its product portfolio, identify opportunities to manage GHG emissions in the Unilever-owned operations (manufacture) and influence managed reductions elsewhere in the Knorr product lifecycles, and assess the impact of the brand's innovation and portfolio strategies on its GHG footprint. Methods A bottom-up product-based life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was considered impractical to assess Knorr's portfolio's complexity. Thus, a meta-product-based accounting LCA approach was followed (Milà i Canals et al. 2009). Up to 16 product types or "meta-products" were assessed in each geographical region, with a total of 36 meta-products assessed globally. Then, the Knorr GHG footprint was derived by multiplying the impacts calculated per tonne of each product type with the sales volumes in 2007. Data for ingredients and processing technologies were gathered from the literature and suppliers; data from Knorr factories were used for the manufacturing stage. The variability in ingredients' production and processing and in manufacture was factored in and propagated through the calculations to assess the robustness of the results. Results The profiles of different meta-products within a product group (e.g. dry soups) follow similar patterns in terms of absolute GHG per tonne and distribution of such emissions along the life cycle. Variations are observed due to recipe composition and electricity mixes in the different regions. The range of variability around absolute results is significant and varies between meta-products. Aggregating the results for individual meta-products with their production volumes, the global Knorr brand GHG footprint in 2007 was estimated to be in the region of 3-5 million tonnes CO 2 e/ annum (95% confidence interval). In spite of the significant variability ranges found, the results are useful for target setting and identification of opportunities for improvement. Conclusions This is the world's first life cycle GHG assessment at brand's product portfolio level. The metaproduct approach simultaneously allows for the assessment and comparison of individual product types as well as for the estimation of a brand's total GHG. The variability assessment enhanced robustness of the results by identifying a confidence range; given the complexity of the studied supply chains and the current data quality translated in wide confidence ranges, single number on-pack carbon labels seem questionable and not robust enough to inform consumers.

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

“…However, the effort and expense of completing such a task means that an LCA tends to be performed selectively in strategically important decision making contexts and the likelihood of process-based LCA being applied to a great many individual products in the economy is perhaps small [53]. In addition, the results of an LCA are rich in detail, but difficult to convey to a remote and non-technical audience (e.g., a product environmental label or declaration).…”

The Role of Science in Shaping Sustainable Business: Unilever Case Study

“…At a product level, recent method developments and applications have included new approaches: to fi ll data gaps in agricultural data (Milà i Canals et al 2011 ;Roches et al 2010 ;Nemecek et al 2012 ); to better represent the impacts arising from land use change (Flynn et al 2012 ;Milà i Canals et al 2013 ); to better represent the impacts arising from product disposal (Muñoz et al 2013 ); and the application of new methods for assessing impacts related to water Van Hoof et al 2011 ). In addition, we have developed approaches to conduct brand/portfolio footprints with examples of Knorr and Ben & Jerry's (Garcia Suarez et al 2008 ;Milà i Canals et al 2010 ). LCA also formed one of the elements of the innovative Brand Imprint process that Unilever (Gowland 2009 ).…”

Social Practices of Ordinary Consumption: An Introduction to Household Metabolism

“…Moreover, whoever uses a product is objectively part of the life-cycle of that product: recent studies highlight that about 25% of the environmental impacts of food products is related to the consumer phase [42]. The study of consumptions, estranging itself from the classical differentia list, identity-making or rationalist paradigms, is able to suggest important research questions, to close the gap, at least, in the field of the environmental studies, between production and consumption, to delineate a scientific picture of studies on the material limits of the planet.…”