2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-011-0206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the flaw size in drilled shafts using an impulse response method

Abstract: Flaws could occur in drilled shafts due to improper quality control, poor workmanship, and unexpected construction mistakes, and thus seriously decrease the loading capacity. This paper proposes a flaw size estimation formula for use in the impulse response test of drilled shafts. Numerical models were built to develop the estimation formula. The experimental cases also validate the estimation. The flaw depth ratio and stiffness ratio are two key parameters to accomplish the estimation. With the evaluation res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e impulse-response test can be used to estimate the aw size of damaged pile structures [2]. e low-strain integrity test (LST) is an NDT method for assessing the structural integrity of piles in soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e impulse-response test can be used to estimate the aw size of damaged pile structures [2]. e low-strain integrity test (LST) is an NDT method for assessing the structural integrity of piles in soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-strain integrity testing (LST) has been utilized to assess the structural health of piles in soil for decades. e piles are subjected to an impact force at the pile head in an impulse response test, and the re ected wave signals are analyzed to evaluate the damage [10,11]. In the traditional LST method, the optimal distance between the striking point and the receiver is 0.5R-0.7 R when the impact location is on the top surface of the pile [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%