2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Extent of Imperfect Competition in the Food Industry: What Have We Learned?

Abstract: Since the late‐1980s, empirical analysis has typically analysed the extent of market power in the food industry using structural econometric models drawing on an approach commonly termed the new empirical industrial organisation (NEIO). In this paper, we examine what has been learned from the use of this methodology, and consider whether it has relevance for empirical analysis of market power in food retailing, and the nature of vertical contractual arrangements between food manufacturers and retailers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If anything, these studies have highlighted the deficiencies in the ability of available economic models to fit either the behavior of supermarkets or the way they compete in the market place. This is not unexpected as the economic literature has highlighted that typical oligopoly/oligopsony models (including models of collusion) are quite simple and do not generally fit the stylised facts observed in retail markets (Sheldon & Sperling, 2003). The challenges that arise when trying to understand supermarkets' behavior are due in part to the scale and complexity of their operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If anything, these studies have highlighted the deficiencies in the ability of available economic models to fit either the behavior of supermarkets or the way they compete in the market place. This is not unexpected as the economic literature has highlighted that typical oligopoly/oligopsony models (including models of collusion) are quite simple and do not generally fit the stylised facts observed in retail markets (Sheldon & Sperling, 2003). The challenges that arise when trying to understand supermarkets' behavior are due in part to the scale and complexity of their operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The issue of the relatively weak bargaining power of family farms as compared to companies operating at other stages of the food chain is an important benchmark in the debate on the effective market organization of the agricultural sector [1][2][3][4]. Consequently, measures aimed at strengthening farmers' market position have become an important part of agricultural policy [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method identifies the market power parameter through rotation of the demand curve (Bresnahan, 1982;Lau 1982). Bresnahan (1989), Sexton and Lavoie (2001), and Sheldon and Sperling (2003) provide overviews of these two approaches. Applications to agricultural product markets are provided by Buschena and Perloff (1991), Love and Murniningtyas (1992), and Azzam and Park (1993).…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand rotation method requires the presence of an exogenous variable that interacts with price to determine demand. For example, changing socio-economic characteristics of the market faced by a CSA will cause the demand curve to shift allowing identification of both demand and marginal cost parameters (Sheldon and Sperling, 2003).…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%