2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the eruption-induced water displacement source of the 15 January 2022 Tonga volcanic tsunami from tsunami spectra and numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MFCI explosions are sensed at distance as “sonic booms.” Because they distort the entire atmospheric column, both eruptive and explosive events may be responsible for the widely documented AG waves ( 9 14 , 16 , 17 , 33 ). However, we contend that in the case of HTHH, the explosive or blast events created the bulk of tsunami ( 28 , 34 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…MFCI explosions are sensed at distance as “sonic booms.” Because they distort the entire atmospheric column, both eruptive and explosive events may be responsible for the widely documented AG waves ( 9 14 , 16 , 17 , 33 ). However, we contend that in the case of HTHH, the explosive or blast events created the bulk of tsunami ( 28 , 34 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The uncertainty in the source model and veracity of attempts to model the detailed hydrodynamics is further underscored by recent work of Heidarzadeh et al ( 2022 ) who modelled the tsunami source as a positive Gaussian bulge on the water surface, or in other words, the direct opposite of the approach used by the previously mentioned studies where the tsunami source is modelled as a depression the ocean surface. Yet the modelling of Heidarzadeh et al ( 2022 ) also somehow manages to produce an acceptable fit to measured data at the New Zealand DART stations, although they did not compare their output to coastal tide gauge records from Nuku’alofa or elsewhere. Thus, the timing of the overtopping surge or surges in western Tongatapu and the timing of the destruction of the weather station, not to mention the details of the tsunami source itself, remain an enigma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-way coupled models have been used to study Rissaga storms in the Balearic sea (Monserrat, Ibbetson & Thorpe 1991;Renault et al 2011;Romero, Vich & Ramis 2019), Abiki storms in Japan (Fukuzawa & Hibiya 2020;Kubota et al 2021), storms in the Adriatic sea (Denamiel et al 2019), storm resonance with tides (Williams et al 2021), continental shelf resonance (Vennell 2007;Thiebaut & Vennell 2011) and shore interactions (Chen & Niu 2018;Dogan et al 2021). Following the Tonga event, OWC models were used to simulate the generated meteotsunami along one-dimensional great-circle lines starting from Tonga (Kakinuma 2022;Sekizawa & Kohyama 2022;Tanioka, Yamanaka & Nakagaki 2022), two-dimensional (2-D) truncated regions of the globe (Heidarzadeh et al 2022;Lynett et al 2022;Pakoksung, Suppasri & Imamura 2022;Peida & Xiping 2022;Ren, Higuera & Liu 2022;Yamada et al 2022) and 2-D global simulations (Kubota, Saito & Nishida 2022;Omira et al 2022). In each of these cases, the atmospheric wave is stripped of its thermodynamic properties and acts as a rigid piston, assuming a sea-level forcing travelling at a set speed that is estimated from available observation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the Tonga event, OWC models were used to simulate the generated meteotsunami along one-dimensional great-circle lines starting from Tonga (Kakinuma 2022; Sekizawa & Kohyama 2022; Tanioka, Yamanaka & Nakagaki 2022), two-dimensional (2-D) truncated regions of the globe (Heidarzadeh et al. 2022; Liu & Higuera 2022; Lynett et al. 2022; Pakoksung, Suppasri & Imamura 2022; Peida & Xiping 2022; Ren, Higuera & Liu 2022; Yamada et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%