2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57615-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the effects of vocational rehabilitation programs in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their results show that workplace training is superior to the other rehabilitation measures. In contrast to this result, based on a bivariate probit model Heshmati and Engström (2001) find that participation in VR programs in Sweden has positive effects on the health status as well as the rate of return to work. Recently, using several matching and weighting estimators, Campolieti et al (2014) find that a VR program in Canada improves the labor market outcomes of women, but not men.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…However, their results show that workplace training is superior to the other rehabilitation measures. In contrast to this result, based on a bivariate probit model Heshmati and Engström (2001) find that participation in VR programs in Sweden has positive effects on the health status as well as the rate of return to work. Recently, using several matching and weighting estimators, Campolieti et al (2014) find that a VR program in Canada improves the labor market outcomes of women, but not men.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…An exception is Heshmati and Engström (2001), who estimated treatment effects relying on a parametric selectivity model and found that participation in VR has positive effects on participants' health status and on their return to work but did not observe any evidence of selection on unobservable characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Educational measures appear to have no or even a negative effect (Heshmati and Engström, 2001;Frölich et al, 2004;Høgelund, 2003;Høgelund and Holm, 2005), whereas workplace based measures such as job training and adaptations of the working conditions are found to have positive effects (see overview articles of Krause et al, 1998;Krause and Lund, 2002).…”
Section: The Return To Work Processmentioning
confidence: 93%