2006
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the critical time‐step in explicit dynamics using the Lanczos method

Abstract: SUMMARYThe goal of our paper is to demonstrate the cost-effective use of the Lanczos method for estimating the critical time step in an explicit, transient dynamics code. The Lanczos method can provide a significantly larger estimate for the critical time-step than an element-based method (the typical scheme). However, the Lanczos method represents a more expensive method for calculating a critical time-step than elementbased methods. Our paper shows how the additional cost of the Lanczos method can be amortiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergence, accuracy, and computational cost, all, are being affected by the t defined in Equation (2) [19,26,[30][31][32]; hence, the appropriate selection of t is of high computational importance, attracting considerable theoretical attention, see also [33][34][35][36]. Currently, it is a general approach to set t (time step size) equal to the largest value satisfying the requirements of numerical stability and consistency (convergence), also, appropriate for accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Convergence, accuracy, and computational cost, all, are being affected by the t defined in Equation (2) [19,26,[30][31][32]; hence, the appropriate selection of t is of high computational importance, attracting considerable theoretical attention, see also [33][34][35][36]. Currently, it is a general approach to set t (time step size) equal to the largest value satisfying the requirements of numerical stability and consistency (convergence), also, appropriate for accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The presented bounds on the respective eigenvalues demonstrate that this approach is safe but conservative: the critical time step computed using the integration point eigenvalues is around 15% lower than the critical time step computed using the elemental eigenvalues for the tests reported in and around 30% lower than the global maximum eigenvalue for the tests reported in . Alternatively, some researchers aim to solve the global eigenvalue problem, using for instance power iteration methods or Lanczos methods . If the difference between global maximum eigenfrequency and elemental maximum frequency is large, such methods may lead to a significant increase in time step size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Direct discretization of (7) can lead to a very large and computationally expensive eigenvalue problem. The common approach to circumvent this challenge is to use the method of snapshots [23] in which the eigenvalue problem is transformed into a smaller one given as…”
Section: Proper Orthogonal Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lanczos method provides larger critical time steps but requires the solution of an eigenvalue problem at multiple stages during the simulation. Some studies have addressed the issue of the added cost of using the Lanczos method and compared it to the cost of the element‐based one. Heinstein et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation