2019
DOI: 10.1002/fut.22086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the connectedness of commodity futures using a network approach

Abstract: Using a network approach of variance decompositions, we measure the connectedness of 18 commodity futures and characterize both static and dynamic connectedness. Our results show that metal futures are net transmitters of shocks to other futures, and agricultural futures are vulnerable to shocks from the others. Furthermore, almost two‐thirds of the volatility uncertainty for commodity futures are due to the connectedness of shocks across the futures market. Dynamically, we find connectedness always increases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Sanders et al (2004) investigated the financialisation of energy commodities (oil, gas), while metals have been studied relatively more recently by ; H. Mayer et al (2017); J. Mayer (2012); Xiao et al (2019). One of the earliest empirical studies investigating the link between commodity futures trading and spot price volatility is Antoniou & Foster (1992).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Sanders et al (2004) investigated the financialisation of energy commodities (oil, gas), while metals have been studied relatively more recently by ; H. Mayer et al (2017); J. Mayer (2012); Xiao et al (2019). One of the earliest empirical studies investigating the link between commodity futures trading and spot price volatility is Antoniou & Foster (1992).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first attempt to investigate the determinants of volatility spillovers in commodity futures markets at different frequencies or time horizons. Previous studies (e.g., Diebold et al, 2017;Xiao et al, 2020) that comprehensively examine commodity futures volatility spillovers do not address these issues. Nevertheless, it is documented that there are low frequency (long-term) and high frequency (short-term) components of agricultural commodity price volatility, and their determinants are different (Karali & Power, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A growing body of literature uses the network approach of Diebold and Yilmaz (2009 to explore return or volatility spillovers in certain categories of commodity futures markets (Dahl et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2020;Siklos et al, 2020). However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few studies (e.g., Diebold et al, 2017;Xiao et al, 2020) attempt to comprehensively investigate the commodity futures volatility spillover network. Furthermore, these studies provide mixed findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) and Xiao et al . (2020). Overall spillover indexes estimated by the frequency connectedness approach on different frequency bands fluctuated between 10% and 70%, and they gradually surged between mid‐2008 and late‐2008, sharing a common trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019), and Xiao et al . (2020). Besides, we diagnose the robustness of the estimated connectedness measures by the D‐Y and the frequency connectedness approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%