2013
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2013.995.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Carbon Assimilation of Growing Cactus Pear Cladodes Through Different Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study confirm that the chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement is a good tool to evaluate the efficient use of radiation in cactus pear (Franck et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of the present study confirm that the chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement is a good tool to evaluate the efficient use of radiation in cactus pear (Franck et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The photosynthetic efficiency of cladodes is expressed by the net assimilation rate (NAR), which is directly related to the plant's growth habit, in which initially there is less shading that provides greater photosynthetic efficiency. The authors of [48], evaluating CO 2 assimilation methods in Opuntia ficus-indica plants, found that shading was responsible for a 50% reduction.…”
Section: Morphophysiological Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cactus-sorghum intercropping system, the higher yield of the forage cactus under the east-west orientation compared to the northsouth (see Table 4) may be related to the greater light capture of plants in east-west orientation, which directly contributes to their development (Peixoto et al, 2018), on the other hand, plants in north-south row orientation suffer shading caused by the sorghum crop on the cactus. Crop shading in intercropping systems can reduce the incidence of light on the smaller crop, causing a reduction in photoassimilates and, consequently, a reduction in the productivity of the shaded crop (Franck et al, 2013;Almeida et al, 2014). This directly influences plant physiology and results in lower levels of chlorophyll compared to plants in full sun (Texeira et al, 2020;Jardim et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%