2008
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the audience level for library resources

Abstract: WorldCat, OCLC's bibliographic database, identifies books and the libraries that hold them. The holdings provide detailed information about the type and number of libraries that have acquired the material. Using this information, it is possible to infer the type of audience for which the material is intended. A quantitative measure, the audience level, is derived from the types of libraries that have selected the resource. The audience level can be used to refine discovery, analyze collections, advise readers,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Academic librarians tend to order books to support educational and research needs based on requests by teaching faculty members, researchers, or students (see Association of College and Research Libraries, ). Academic library holding statistics may therefore reflect a combination of teaching and research impact, and these data are useful to assess the value of scholarly books (Calhoun, ; O'Neill, Connaway, & Dickey, ; Torres‐Salinas & Moed, , ). The term libcitation has been coined for the number of libraries holding a book based on national or international union catalogs as an indication of its “cultural benefit” (White et al., , p. 1087) and libcitations have been proposed to complement citations in the evaluation of humanities scholars (Linmans, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic librarians tend to order books to support educational and research needs based on requests by teaching faculty members, researchers, or students (see Association of College and Research Libraries, ). Academic library holding statistics may therefore reflect a combination of teaching and research impact, and these data are useful to assess the value of scholarly books (Calhoun, ; O'Neill, Connaway, & Dickey, ; Torres‐Salinas & Moed, , ). The term libcitation has been coined for the number of libraries holding a book based on national or international union catalogs as an indication of its “cultural benefit” (White et al., , p. 1087) and libcitations have been proposed to complement citations in the evaluation of humanities scholars (Linmans, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, it would be based on a combination of the two. Libraries might also look to how audience-level analyses of the collection and use of OCLC's WorldCat-derived evaluation tools (O'Neill, Connaway, and Dickey 2008) can provide insight to select for their users' distinct characteristics.…”
Section: Kellymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Providing title-level catalog records for microform collections also enables libraries to evaluate their collections for duplication and to make retention decisions. 23 With space becoming ever more precious, title-level cataloging allows libraries to create cooperative agreements to share microforms across multiple locations, thus reducing the microform footprint at a single library. 24 These issues are still occurring in today's information environment, and libraries need to better administer their microform collections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%