2007
DOI: 10.1177/0021998307076487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Surface Damage of Composite Panels with Inverse Analysis

Abstract: When composite structures are exposed to harsh environmental conditions or impacted by foreign objects, their surfaces may degrade or damage. Damage evaluations of composite panels often demand expensive tools and time-consuming processes. The aim of this work is to introduce a versatile inverse analysis based method that requires less measurement efforts than those of conventional techniques. In this procedure, first, strains are measured on a surface opposite to damaged surface. Then, general functions relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To process the data, the singular value decomposition (SVD) method, which minimizes errors arising from the model discretization, is adopted. The method is a multi-variable leastsquare fit to generate the best estimates from available or known relations (Mottershead and Foster, 1991;Ramanujam and Nakamura, 2007). Here, the following procedure is established.…”
Section: Determination Of Materials Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To process the data, the singular value decomposition (SVD) method, which minimizes errors arising from the model discretization, is adopted. The method is a multi-variable leastsquare fit to generate the best estimates from available or known relations (Mottershead and Foster, 1991;Ramanujam and Nakamura, 2007). Here, the following procedure is established.…”
Section: Determination Of Materials Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the parameter that will be investigated is chosen (e.g. modal parameter [14][15][16], strain [17]). The parameter value should change in the presence of the defect, so that the change can be derived from the measurements and the FEM analysis of an undamaged and damaged specimen.…”
Section: Second Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U and σ the mean and standard deviation of all subregions strain energies in the shell. In hydraulic internal pressure, the strain energy was good linearity with the pressure, and the singularity strain energy would mean that the subregion was damaged [5]. G23 and Poisson's ratio ν23 are not evident in thin plate, the values of G23 and ν23 were assumed to be the same as G12 and ν12.…”
Section: Principle Of Subregion Strain Energymentioning
confidence: 99%