1992
DOI: 10.5558/tfc68623-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating stump volume, stump inside bark diameter and diameter at breast height from stump measurements

Abstract: Equations were derived for estimating stump volume, stump inside bark diameter at any given height from ground and diameter at breast height from measured stump height and stump inside bark diameter. The equations were tested on 33 British Columbia commercial tree species groups and the results of four species groups are presented in this paper. This prediction system will play an important role in "waste" or "residue" surveys in British Columbia and in reconstructing the initial stand conditions by estimating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 1.3 m). We used an equation for Douglas-fir, which accounts for lower bole taper and bark thickness (Kozak and Omule 1992).…”
Section: Stump Diameter Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 1.3 m). We used an equation for Douglas-fir, which accounts for lower bole taper and bark thickness (Kozak and Omule 1992).…”
Section: Stump Diameter Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine growth increments during each year, increment cores at DBH were collected in the spring of 1991 from 20 trees of all size classes in each plot. Annual ring widths were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm and annual basal area increment was calculated for each tree using DBH inside bark (Kozak and Omule 1992).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting volume from stump diameters should be useful to public and private owners of timber. A review of the literature indicated that prediction of dbh from stump measurement is common, but predictions of volume are relatively sparse (Ugurlu & Ö zer, 1977;Bylin, 1982;Demaerschalk & Omule, 1982;Johnson & Weigel, 1990;Kozak & Omule, 1992;Parresol, 1993;Chhetri Khatry & Fowler, 1996;Weigel & Johnson, 1997;Yavuz, 1996Yavuz, , 2000Wiant & Brooks, 2007;Corral-Rivas et al, 2007). The dbh can be estimated from the diameter at stump height with a high degree of accuracy owing to the high correlation between the two variables (Johnson & Weigel, 1990) and this relationship should not change much over time (Wharton, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%