2016
DOI: 10.1214/15-ejs1081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating structured high-dimensional covariance and precision matrices: Optimal rates and adaptive estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, Σ has to be estimated. We may apply an existing method, such as the banding and thresholding technique, to estimate a high-dimensional sparse covariance matrix (Bickel and Levina, 2008;Cai and Liu, 2011); see Cai et al (2016) for an excellent review. Under the α mixing assumption C2, σ ij is close to zero when |i − j| is large and thus we may apply the banding approach of Bickel and Levina (2008) …”
Section: C9 the Conditionally α-Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, Σ has to be estimated. We may apply an existing method, such as the banding and thresholding technique, to estimate a high-dimensional sparse covariance matrix (Bickel and Levina, 2008;Cai and Liu, 2011); see Cai et al (2016) for an excellent review. Under the α mixing assumption C2, σ ij is close to zero when |i − j| is large and thus we may apply the banding approach of Bickel and Levina (2008) …”
Section: C9 the Conditionally α-Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of work on high dimensional covariance and precision matrix estimation: see for example the recent review paper of Cai et al (2016) and references therein. Much of the work on the specific setting with latent confounding has focused on estimation of the precision matrix Ω, which is assumed to be sparse.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods focus on classes of matrices with some sparsity constraint, either on the covariance matrix itself or on its inverse, the precision matrix. See [10] for a recent survey. Among these matrix classes, the one that fits more naturally our local patch models is the spiked covariance, which expresses the covariance matrix as a low-rank signal component plus noise (AGWN).…”
Section: Empirical Wiener Filters For Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%