1998
DOI: 10.1080/096031098332844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating structural exchange rate models by artificial neural networks

Abstract: No theory of structural exchange rate determination has yet been found that performs well in prediction experiments. Only very seldom has the simple random walk model been significantly outperformed. Referring to three, sometimes highly nonlinear, monetary and nonmonetary structural exchange rate models, a feedforward artificial neural network specification is investigated to determine whether it improves the prediction performance of structural and random walk exchange rate models. A new test for univariate n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other studies involving ANNs were less encouraging. Plasmans et al (1998) and Verkooijen (1996) used macroeconomic models, but they could not produce any satisfactory monthly forecasts. However, Zhang and Hu (1998) modeled exchange rate as depending non-linearly on its past values, and their model outperformed simple linear models, but they never compared it to a random walk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other studies involving ANNs were less encouraging. Plasmans et al (1998) and Verkooijen (1996) used macroeconomic models, but they could not produce any satisfactory monthly forecasts. However, Zhang and Hu (1998) modeled exchange rate as depending non-linearly on its past values, and their model outperformed simple linear models, but they never compared it to a random walk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the expected real exchange rate gap is partly covered by the previous gap and partly by the exchange rate difference. Despite the widespread use of UIP, estimates for η are not one as UIP predicts, but usually small and quantitatively similar for OECD countries - Plasmans, Verkooijen, and Daniëls (1998) and ASEAN countries -Boldea, Engwerda, Michalak, Plasmans, and Salmah (2010). We show in Section 7 that the exchange rate dynamics is well-specified across all models and identification strategies we use.…”
Section: Open Economymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The third equation specifies the exchange rate path. Unlike in Berg, Karam, and Laxton (2006), the real exchange rate dynamics is a linear expected exchange rate rule, known as "partially uncovered interest parity" -see Plasmans, Verkooijen, andDaniëls (1998) andDe Grauwe andVansteenkiste (2007). Unlike Mkrtchyan, Dabla-Norris, and Stepanyan (2009), we do not impose uncovered interest parity (UIP), as it would require perfect capital mobility and complete financial markets, features that are unlikely to hold for developing countries like Armenia.…”
Section: Open Economymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2 For an overview of the Neural Networks (NN) literature, see Poggio and Girosi (1990), Hertz et al (1991), White (1992), Hutchinson et al (1994). Plasmans et al (1998) and Franses and Homelen (1998) investigated the ability of NN on forecasting exchange rates. The non-linearity found in exchange rates is due to ARCH effects.…”
Section: The Arch Processmentioning
confidence: 99%