2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating spot volatility with high-frequency financial data

Abstract: We construct a spot volatility estimator for high-frequency financial data which contain market microstructure noise. We prove consistency and derive the asymptotic distribution of the estimator. A data-driven method is proposed to select the scale parameter and the bandwidth parameter in the estimator. In Monte Carlo simulations, we compare the finite sample performance of our estimator with some existing estimators. Empirical examples are given to illustrate the potential applications of the estimator.JEL Cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mancini et al . () and Zu and Boswijk () studied the problem of estimating spot volatility with the presence of microstructure noise. Although Mancini et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mancini et al . () and Zu and Boswijk () studied the problem of estimating spot volatility with the presence of microstructure noise. Although Mancini et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully nonparametric methods when volatility is instead a càdlàg process have been studied by Malliavin and Mancino [33,34] and Kristensen [32] in the absence of jumps, and by Zu and Boswijk [53], Hoffmann, Munk and Schmidt-Hieber [22] and Ogawa and Sanfelici [42] in the absence of jumps but with noisy observations. Related studies include the idea of rolling sample volatility estimators in Foster and Nelson [20], see also Andreou and Ghysels [4], the theory of spot volatility estimation developed in Bandi and Renò [7], and the kernel based methods of Fan and Wang [17], and Mykland and Zhang [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, our spot covariance matrix estimator (12) converges considerably faster than existing noise-robust spot volatility estimators based on the difference quotient of integrated volatility estimates (e.g. Zu and Boswijk, 2014). The two-step approach (12) with combinations over different frequencies strongly reduces the estimator's variance (compared to simpler methods).…”
Section: Asymptotic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To account for noise, the predominant approach is to compute a difference quotient based on a noise-robust integrated volatility estimator, e.g., the (univariate) realized kernel, the pre-averaging estimator or the two-scale estimator. Here, examples include Mykland and Zhang (2008), Mancini et al (2015), Bos et al (2012) and Zu and Boswijk (2014). An alternative approach based on series estimators of non-stochastic spot volatility is introduced by Munk and Schmidt-Hieber (2010b), while Munk and Schmidt-Hieber (2010a) study optimal convergence rates in the aforementioned setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%