2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-001-0169-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA: comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this recharge may be limited by the low infiltration area offered by ditches compared to plot areas (Flint et al 2002). Nevertheless, during periods of low water table after drought, the groundwater recharge can be very important as, for example, the case of intermittent rivers in semi-arid and arid areas (Crerar et al 1988;Hughes and Sami 1992).…”
Section: Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this recharge may be limited by the low infiltration area offered by ditches compared to plot areas (Flint et al 2002). Nevertheless, during periods of low water table after drought, the groundwater recharge can be very important as, for example, the case of intermittent rivers in semi-arid and arid areas (Crerar et al 1988;Hughes and Sami 1992).…”
Section: Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both water balance models and CMB are proper methods for a watershed or regional approach (Flint et al, 2002). While CMB presents the advantage of being a simple concept with few parameters needed, it also has several limitations such as assumptions not completely valid for fractured rocks or the high variability of Cl − deposition rate with time; these limitations increase the uncertainties of its results, for this reason CMB results are used only to compare with water balance model results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have defined the most appropriate techniques for estimating recharge as a function of climate conditions and site characteristics (Stephens et al, 1996;Flint et al, 2002), others describe concepts related to recharge integration and interaction with other water budget components (Devlin and Sophocleous, 2005;de Vries and Simmers, 2002). present a comprehensive overview of physical, chemical and mathematical techniques for recharge estimation and water transfer during the infiltration process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%