2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0137111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating random close packing in polydisperse and bidisperse hard spheres via an equilibrium model of crowding

Abstract: We show that an analogy between crowding in fluid and jammed phases of hard spheres captures the density dependence of the kissing number for a family of numerically generated jammed states. We extend this analogy to jams of mixtures of hard spheres in $d=3$ dimensions, and thus obtain an estimate of the random close packing (RCP) volume fraction, $\phi_{\textrm{RCP}}$, as a function of size polydispersity. We first consider mixtures of particle sizes with discrete distributions. For binary systems, we show ag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fit of the VFT law to the data is shown in Figure b, resulting in a ϕ VFT of 0.65 ± 0.04. This almost matches the random close packing concentration of ϕ RCP = 0.68 for hard spheres with a size dispersity of δ = 15% and has been observed previously. …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…A fit of the VFT law to the data is shown in Figure b, resulting in a ϕ VFT of 0.65 ± 0.04. This almost matches the random close packing concentration of ϕ RCP = 0.68 for hard spheres with a size dispersity of δ = 15% and has been observed previously. …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…As noticed in refs and , for these systems, the critical packing fraction ϕ c occupied by the monomers at the glass transition can be reasonably expressed as ϕ normalc = ϕ normalc * normalΛ z co where z co = 2(1 – 1/ n ) is the average connectivity due to intrachain covalent bonds, ϕ c * is the maximum packing fraction occupied by the monomers at the glass transition in the absence of covalent bonds (i.e., in case z co = 0), and Λ is a parameter expressing the effect of topological constraints due to covalent bonds on ϕ c . It follows that, when the already mentioned relation ln(1/ϕ) = α T T + c is evaluated at the glass transition ( T g , z c , and ϕ c ), after linearization, one correctly obtains the Fox–Flory-type relation between T g , thermal expansion, and molecular weight α T T normalg ( 1 c ϕ c * + 2 Λ ) 2 normalΛ n When the values n ≈ 200, c ≈ 0.48, Λ ≈ 0.1, α T = 2 × 10 –4 K –1 , and ϕ c * ≈ 0.64 (i.e., ϕ c * coinciding with the random close packing of a system of hard spheres ) as found in polymer glass ,, and T g = 383 K are considered, a G ( T ) profile in agreement with experimental data of ref follows from the insertion of eq into eqs and and of the resulting expressions, in turn, into eq (see, e.g., Figure 4 of ref ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The data shows a convex Z ( φ ) relation, so a power ζ > 1. Also, the model by Zaccone et al 26 and Anzivino et al 39 yields a convex equation. This can be attributed to their assumption that Z is proportional to the product of φ and the semi-empirical Carnahan-Starling (CS) expression.…”
Section: Contact Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%