1995
DOI: 10.1109/78.348131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating random amplitude polynomial phase signals: a cyclostationary approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in the literature on estimation of PPS parameters are limited to the monocomponent case such as fast maximum likelihood (ML) [1], fast instantaneous frequency (IF) estimation [18], the dechirping algorithm [7], the nonlinear instantaneous least squares (NILS) [3], the well-known high ambiguity function (HAF) [19], [21]- [24], and its numerous extensions to timevarying and random amplitudes [8], [10], [11], [15], [16], [29], [31]. Other issues relating to monocomponent polynomial phase signal (mono-PPS) analysis include aliasing [2], nonuniform sampling schemes [13] and bootstrap model selection [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in the literature on estimation of PPS parameters are limited to the monocomponent case such as fast maximum likelihood (ML) [1], fast instantaneous frequency (IF) estimation [18], the dechirping algorithm [7], the nonlinear instantaneous least squares (NILS) [3], the well-known high ambiguity function (HAF) [19], [21]- [24], and its numerous extensions to timevarying and random amplitudes [8], [10], [11], [15], [16], [29], [31]. Other issues relating to monocomponent polynomial phase signal (mono-PPS) analysis include aliasing [2], nonuniform sampling schemes [13] and bootstrap model selection [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parametric methods mostly based on polynomial phase modeling may be used to analyze and estimate such signals and separate them into their components; such as nonlinear least squares techniques [1,2], a maximum likelihood algorithm [3], an expectation-maximization based method [4], an array processing approach based on state estimation via an extended Kalman filter [5], a cyclic moment based method for polynomial phase signals with independent random amplitudes [6], techniques using transforms like high-order ambiguity function [7][8][9] and time-frequency (TF) Hough transform [10][11][12], and an approach for chirplet approximation [13], among other such methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar signal models for which parameter estimation techniques have been developed include random amplitude sinusoids [9], constant amplitude polynomial phase signals [6] and deterministic time-varying amplitude frequency modulated signals [3]. Estimation procedures for the problem we are considering here have been reported in [1,4,8]. In [1], two estimation algorithms were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], Ghogho et al proposed a technique based on the maximum likelihood criterion which is asymptotically efficient when the random interferences are white Gaussian processes. We consider the estimation procedure proposed in [8] which uses the cyclic moments of the observed signal to estimate the phase parameters. The subject of this paper is a statistical accuracy analysis of the phase parameter estimators obtained from the cyclic moments for the case where the signal is modelled by (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%