2019
DOI: 10.1002/dac.3999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating rainfall using machine learning strategies based on weather radar data

Abstract: SummaryThe precision of forecasting rainfall is vital owing to current world climate change. As deterministic weather forecasting models are usually time consuming, it becomes challenging to efficiently use this large volume of data in hand. Machine learning methods are already proven to be good replacement for traditional deterministic approaches in weather prediction. This paper presents an approach using recurrent neural networks (RNN) and long short term memory (LSTM) techniques to improve the rainfall for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that RMSE is most useful when big mistakes are particularly unnecessary. 24,25 The MAE and RMSE can be used together in a series of forecasts to identify the variability in the errors as shown in Table 2. The RMSE will often be superior or equal to the MAE; the greater their variance, the greater the sample variance in the individual errors.…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that RMSE is most useful when big mistakes are particularly unnecessary. 24,25 The MAE and RMSE can be used together in a series of forecasts to identify the variability in the errors as shown in Table 2. The RMSE will often be superior or equal to the MAE; the greater their variance, the greater the sample variance in the individual errors.…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the Z and Z DR fields need to be corrected from attenuation before applied in the precipitation classification and QPE. Different attenuation correction methods were proposed using the differential phase (φ DP ) measurement such as the linear φ DP approach, the standard ZPHI method, and the iterative ZPHI method (e.g., Jameson, 1992;Carey et al, 2000;Testud et al, 2000;Park et al, 2005). Because of its simplicity and easy implementation in a real-time system, the linear φ DP method was applied in the current work.…”
Section: Input Polarimetric Radar Variables and Preprocessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms using meteorological radar data have been developed well during the past 2 decades. With the assistance of AI, weather radar's capabilities in severe weather prediction, rainfall rate estimation, and lightning detection have apparently been improved (e.g., Capozzi et al, 2018;T. et al, 2019;Yen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introduction Of Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model can also handle regression and classification problems, and it has the ability to handle missing data [5]. In a study by Srinivas, et al [6] on rainfall prediction, they compared XGBoost with other machine learning methods, including LSTM and RF, and discovered that XGBoost performed better than them in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The performance of XGBoost is 99% accuracy, while RF gives 92% accuracy, and LSTM gives an accuracy of 42% [6].…”
Section: Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost)mentioning
confidence: 99%